Humor- Something Different for a Change

You just got to laugh at some of today politics.
While some will not find this humorous, I think we all need to sit back and smile for once.
Especially with all the seriousness going on in our world, we still need a break from it.

Enjoy!

Either Call the Kettle Black, or Get Out of the Race

There a two distinct differances between Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich.
Newt will call it like it truly is.
Mitt refuses to label Obama a Socialist and that makes his view of Obama suspect.

In this clip yesterday with David Gregory on Meet The Press, Newt calls it like it is. Obama's a Saul Alinsky Radical.

What I said last night is the truth. Nobody in the elite media wants to cover it. Nobody's ever gone back and looked at what Saul Alinsky stands for. Nobody ever asks what neighborhood organizer meant. He wasn't organizing Boys and Girls Clubs. He was teaching political radicalism. It explains his entire administration.

Keystone Pipeline- A big fat NO

An oil industry source is quoted to have said today that the US state dept spokesman will tell Canada, the oil industry and the American people, including the AFL-CIO, that it will reject the Keystone pipeline from Canada to the gulf coast region.


Their reasoning is that there has not be sufficient time with in the 60 day requirement from congress to study the environmental impact for such a project.

Of course, the studies have been sitting on Obama desk now for 3 years and The pipeline had been through several other federal, state and local approvals. But I guess he was too busy taking his 23rd vacation in as many years to pick it up and read the damn thing.

The problem with what is expected to come from the state dept is…. IT’S NOT UP TO THEM TO EXCEPT OR REJECT IT!

It’s the Presidents’ sole decision based on the legislation passed last Dec from the payroll tax cut extension.

But of course the deal that Boehner cut with Reid, assured that even if the decision was to come from Obama, he’d reject it anyways.
Reid and the Obama Administration have been bloviating how the House Republicans are obstructionist.
Well, what the hell is THIS, then?

Of course, for the State Dept to reject it, (even though they have no power to), should tell you one thing.
They are trying to protect Obama during an election year. To Protect him from having his direct administration official(s) make this public statement, all the while the enviro-n-chief spends his time campaigning and not governing.

Canada's prime minister has warned if the U.S. can't get collective sh*t together, Canada will look to team with China.
"Unfortunately Prime Minister Harper of Canada just this week said because of the volatile indecisiveness on the part of this president, that they feel they are being held hostage and they will take their energy elsewhere specifically to Asia and China," Jack Gerard, president and CEO of the American Petroleum Institute,

The NRDC has recently stated “It is not in the national interest to lock the United States into supporting an expensive and dirty form of oil for many years to come. Also, additional capacity for tar sands oil perpetuates America's addiction to oil, and undermines the clean energy alternatives that would bring genuine energy security."

GENUINE Clean energy security? Do they mean the type of energy, like solar panels? You know, the technology that has already costs us nearly $3B in the last 2 years and we have NOTHING to show for it? Do they mean the “alternative energy” that at best could only provide this nation with only 20% of its energy needs to keep its economy sputtering along?

This administration and its lunatic cronies have a mission. To see this nation roll back to the horse and buggy days.

Ron Paul Supporters- Hardcore Dedication-ist

Ron Paul supporter are truly individuals who share common intent of voting for no GOP candidate other than Ron Paul.  OK that is understandable... in the primaries.


However, they say, if Ron Paul is not to be the Republican nominee, their sincere hope is that Congressman Paul would then run as a 3rd Party candidate, even if it meant splitting some of the Republican vote.
Such a scenario would greatly enhance Barack Obama’s chances of being re-elected in 2012, as history as proven from the Bush Sr/Bill Clinton/Ross Perot presidential election, but they hold firm to their apparent conviction that Ron Paul, and Ron Paul alone, represents the best interests of American conservatism. 


While I admire their dedication of his political convictions, the attitude leaves me with questions of the true intent of someone professing to be a conservative but at the same time expressing willingness to allow perhaps the most leftist Big Government liberal to ever occupy the White House another four years.


Ron Paul himself gave a recent and quite clear indication he would not consider running as a 3rd party candidate.  Congressman Paul awareness that to do so would quite possibly result in Barack Obama being a two-term president. A scenario it seems Mr. Paul is unwilling to participate in. But so many of his own supporters have indicated their strong conviction to do just that- Run on a 3rd ticket. 
Many Paul supporters have expressed to me that if he is not the nominee and doesn't run on a 3 party candidacy, they will sit out the 2012 elections.


Are his supporters aware there is ongoing discussion within the Libertarian movement of whether or not Mr. Paul is seen as one of the big Government liberals when it comes to foreign policy,  support for gay marriage and drug legalization. As well as supporting state-approved abortions??


Granted, each of these issues are, through the prism of Ron Paul’s views, are state rights issues, and so still earns him a smaller federal government street credential, but the fact he supports such seemingly anti-conservative values should give at least some Ron Paul supporters pause.


Paul wishes to see homosexuals openly serving in the United States military. Paul supports the legalization of almost all forms of pornography and prostitution.  Ron Paul places no value in God and faith within the context of society’s morals, yet on his own website he then gives a strong declaration of personal faith in Jesus Christ and America’s “God-given rights”.


Would Ron Paul supporters rather see Barack Obama win a second term as President of the United States than say, Herman Cain, or Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney?
And if so, is it quite possible that some within the Ron Paul camp are in fact, Obama operatives pushing for that very scenario?

Finally, please note that I am a supporter of many of Ron Paul’s domestic policy ideas and am pleased to see him helping to focus the national conversation on the subjects of limited government and fiscal responsibility.  I would gladly vote for him for president over Barack Obama. I do not consider Congressman Paul to be the ideal candidate. Far from it!
But would it be to much to simply ask Ron Paul followers to do the same if he is not the nominee?

Fast & Furious-NRA Releases Video to Fire Holder

As the scandal continues to unfold, day after day, with new testimony on operation Fast and Furious, and that more guns are being discovered, its becoming more and more apparent that the calls for Obama to can Eric Holder are coming from all angles.

This recently released video from the National Riffle Association, calls out to Americans to call the Whitehouse and demand Obama to do the right thing.

FIRE HOLDER, NOW!

Democracy Denied

Democracy Denied is a guide to understanding and defeating the radical agenda that President Barack Obama is implementing by unilateral regulatory action through his agencies and czars.


This is a must read book. Even though you and I might be living it, it is a perpetual insight of Obama's agenda to march the nation to an engineered Social Society, regardless of who controls congress.
As we are fully aware of, he is backdooring "rules" utilize executive powers. 

This is a powerful message, a powerful read.



Constitutionally, he has no authority to execute executive power be on the law.
And though there is no Constitutional provision or statute that explicitly permits Executive Orders, there is a vague grant of "executive power" given in Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 of the Constitution, and furthered by the declaration "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed" made in Article II, Section 3, Clause 4.