Anwar al-Awlaki Killed-UPDATED

As reported on Fox News: (and this is HUGE)

Terror mastermind and senior Al Qaeda leader Anwar al-Awlaki is dead, senior U.S. officials confirmed to Fox News
Al-Awlaki, a U.S.-born Islamic militant cleric who became a prominent figure in Al Qaeda's most active branch, using his fluent English and Internet savvy to draw recruits to carry out attacks in the United States, was killed Friday in the mountains of Yemen, American and Yemeni officials said.The Yemeni government and Defense Ministry announced al-Awlaki's death, but gave no details. A senior U.S. official said American intelligence supports the claim that he had been killed. Another confirmed that the Al Qaeda leader was dead, describing him as a "big fish." Neither would confirm or deny if it was a U.S. airstrike.


If this holds true this would be big, as many believe al-Awlaki was next in line to succeed Bin Laden.
Wonder if Michael Moore will condemn it since he wasn't brought to trail in the US

----------------------------------------------UPDATE-------------------------------------------

Killed along with al-Awlaki was this very well know American raised jihadist.

Samir Khan: Who was well known for his writings on the internet, but not much for his jihadist actions.

From Michelle Malkin post this morning:

Some excerpts of Khan Manifesto that I found interestingly ironic.
  

I would always laugh whenever the start of Ramadan would occur in America and the President would take a few minutes to articulate on how marvelous Islam is; almost as if he himself was to become Muslim. I would laugh because they would show this face in their country, and a different face in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guantanamo Bay.

The American regime is still scratching its head on the question: why did Usama bin Ladin attack us? America, take a hint for once: maybe you did something. It should then come as no surprise that the Muslims in your midst – like Nidal Hassan, Faisal Shahzad, and others – became traitors of your state due to your conduct. If you don’t want to spend the rest of your life worrying about preventing another attack, then take the advice of Wikileaks editor, Julian Assange: “If U.S. forces are demoralized because they have been assassinating people without going through the judicial process or because they have been engaged in civilian casualties; if they are demoralized by that, they should change their behavior.”

Therefore, I am proud to be a traitor in America’s eyes just as much as I am proud to be a Muslim; and I take this opportunity to accentuate my oath of allegiance (bai`yah) and the mujahidin of the Arabian Peninsula’s bai`yah to the ferocious lion, the champion of jihad, the humble servant of God, my beloved Shaykh, Usama bin Ladin, may Allah protect him. Verily, he is the man that has shook the thrones of the tyrants of the world. We pledge to wage jihad for the rest of our lives until either we implant Islam all over the world or meet our Lord as bearers of Islam. And how reputable, adventurous and pleasurable is such a life compared to those who remain sitting, working from nine to five?

GOODBYE and GOOD RIDANCE!

Obama's Millionaire Buddies Are At it Again.

Following in lockstep with billionaire investor Warren Buffet, former Google employee and millionaire Doug Edwards asked President Obama a... well pretty stupid question.
And by the look and pause of Edwards, it is pretty obvious he was not comfortable asking "Would you please raise my taxes?" All this at a town hall meeting in California Monday.

In response to Edwards question, Obama asked "what start up company did you work for?" Based on Obama's expression when posing this question to his campaign donor Edwards, it appears that this guy is nothing but a plant for Obama, to backup his argument that millionaires and billionaires "must pay their fair share".



"And it chills me to see Congress not supporting the expiration of tax cuts that have been benefiting so many of us for so long."
Now, does it chill him or piss him off that most of us in the country have been able to keep the money we worked for, for so long.
It is our property.
But if Edwards is willing to give up some more of his money, WHIP OUT the old checkbook and have at it, Douggie.

This guy is an imbecile!

Whitehouse Petition Calls for Eisenhower Era Tax Level

As I roll threw my bookmarks of Anti- Capitalist, Anti- Constitutionalist, Anti- Tea party Facebook pages, I came upon this page,The Americans Against The Tea Party.
A Progressive page that totes the Presidents Social Justice agenda.

As I troll through their numerous post (they have a strict policy of reporting trolls...) I discovered a direct link to the Whitehouse website, under a heading of Roll back tax policy to Eisenhower levels.
According to the Petition that is posted to the Whitehouse Website it aims to:

Roll back taxes to the rates of America's Golden Age. The trendy new-fashioned tax rates we've embraced in the recent years have been disastrous for economic growth. It's time to embrace the traditional tax rates that worked for our fathers and our grandfathers.Looking at a list of present-day companies formed in the 50's, it's easy to see that Eisenhower's tax rates created a fertile environment for business.America does not need Avant-garde tax theory: America needs tax rates that have stood the test of time. Roll back taxes to Eisenhower levels.

Now, whats ironic is the words "Roll Back". I'd say roll ahead, but thats just me.
But what you don't see in the wording of the petition is this. At what level of income does this petition call for a Roll back on taxes to America's Golden Age.
So with that said, here is the tax rate for income levels from the Eisenhower's Golden Age (1953- 1961):

Year	$10,001	$20,001	$60,001	$100,001	$250,001	$500,001	$1M

1954	38%	56%	78%	89%	91%	91%	91%
1956	26%	38%	62%	75%	89%	91%	91%
1958	26%	38%	62%	75%	89%	91%	91%
1960	26%	38%	62%	75%	89%	91%	91%
1961	26%	38%	62%	75%	89%	91%	91%

Current Tax Rates:

Year	$10,001	$20,001	$60,001	$100,001	$250,001	$372,950	$1,000,000

2010	10%	15%	15%	25%	33%	35%	35%

So it appears that the Progressives want to raise the rates on those making below the poverty level by 16% along with raising the rate of those who are above the poverty level from anywhere from 24% to as high as 56%

And for a little fun, some comments from the Facebook page, that I found as lunacy.

Our trendy low tax rates have been disastrous. That much is true. Because of them, America can't afford to pay for it's spending. That means more burden is on the safety nets to provide the people with the resources for basic living, which is unsustainable because even as the rich get richer, they pay less taxes to support the government.

OK, since when is it the responsibility of the rich to support our Government? 
But what  stands out is "Can't afford to pay for it's spending"..... 
THEN STOP SPENDING!

Tax Rate under Pres. Eisenhower was 91% whereas today its only 18% for the wealthy.

Can you say CLUELESS DIMWIT!

 ALRIGHT, Who's been into my paint chips????

The lot of you have over indulged, I'd say!

It isn't fair for 90% of people to be taxed on every dime of earned income while people making over 100K don't.

This person OD'd on the paint chips!

Another truth is millionairres do not work harder than you and I. Well, not me anyway

 WAAAAAAA. I work harder then everyone.

SH*T, these moonbats are off their rocker.

Move On Jobs Initiative- Take a Photo?

This jobs initiative comes from the bowls of Move On.

Their plan, take a photo of places and things where the Government can create jobs. Not private sector jobs, but Government jobs.

These Photos will be sent to congress to waste their time to convince them that Government is the solution to job creation and recovery. 

Spend, Spend, Spend...

-Can you take a photo to help create jobs?  

Yesterday, President Obama spoke from the Brent Spence bridge over the Ohio River about the vital connection between jobs and infrastructure repair. The Brent Spence bridge has been rated functionally obsolete and unsafe, it carries nearly twice the traffic it was designed to handle, and earlier this year, chunks of concrete fell from its upper level. And it isn't the only essential piece of infrastructure that's falling apart.

It's shameful that our bridges are literally crumbling while construction workers are unable to find employment. America's infrastructure needs work, and Americans need jobs. The solution is obvious: Put people back to work repairing our bridges, dams, highways, schools, and the rest of our failing infrastructure.

We're putting pressure on Congress to pass a jobs plan that does just that. But we need to make the problem visible. That's why the American Dream movement is setting out to find and photograph the jobs that need doing—and we need your help.

Can you take a picture of a job that needs doing in your community? 

OK, sure I can help with that. And it is essential to our existence. 

It's wide spread and desperate, in every city, town and village.

There's several pictures of places that need work immediately before IT collapses.

HOPE THAT HELPS!

Vile Lib, One Class Act!

Bristol Palin, out on the town and enjoying a night at a local bar, trying out the mechanical bull and just enjoying the music and having fun. Sounds harmless, right?

But of course it didn't turn out that way.
A local yahoo, who obviously had to much to drink, just couldn't keep his liberal trap shut, after Palin finished her ride on the bull, he had to get his 15 minutes of fame in and verbally attacked her and Bristol mom, Sarah Palin.

Palin unexpectedly found herself in the middle of a heated argument after this lowlife yelled "Did you ride Levi like that?" and "Your mother's a whore!"




This guy needs to get his head shoved up a real bulls ass!

Work for An Idiot, Be An Idiot

Republicans on a House oversight panel today sharply questioned whether the Obama administration was looking to inflate the number of "green" jobs by using a broad brush.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, grilled officials from the departments of Energy and Labor during the hearing with the government's subsidization of the clean-energy sector, in the wake of a controversy over loans to a now-bankrupt solar firm.

"Three years and billions of taxpayer dollars later, the American people have received very little return on the president's signature investment," Issa said and suggesting officials were trying to pad the figures.
Labor Secretary Hilda Solis when grilled about this in the hearing pointed to a separate study claiming 2.7 million Americans are in "clean economy" positions.

"It's offensive," Rep. Connie Mack, R-Fla., as he raised his voice while questioning Solis.

Mack argued that just because a bus driver is driving a hybrid bus doesn't mean it's a green job.

"Yes it is," Solis countered.

OK, let’s stop there. Bus drivers have one purpose and that is to take people from one stop to the next stop that they intend to get off at. That is the job of the driver. Nothing more, nothing less. It’s just that plain and simple.

HOWEVER Solis and the BLS are working off a definition that the job of a bus driver is a green job because it "benefits the environment or conserve natural resources." And that "involves making their establishment's production processes more environmentally friendly."

That’s it NOT the driver responsibility!

When BLS Commissioner Keith Hall was questioned, his response was "Our green jobs include mass transit, so actually any bus service,"
"Oh, ok," a surprised Issa exclaimed. "So let me understand this. ... You're counting everyone that drives a bus as a green job."

Hall: "Mass transit is a green service."

Issa: "Oh. My. Goodness. I didn't know that."

Issa said that the bureau is relying on bad numbers. "If I put LEDs in my office, apparently my staff becomes a green staff,"

Some folks think Obama and his administration are intelligent, smart people and so goes those who work for them.

Does this sound intelligent?

AP Fact Checks Obama Tax The Rich Claim

Yep, thats right. You read the headline correct.

AP... Associated Press, fact checked Obama's and Buffett's tax claim that they are using as an excuse to raise taxes on the top earners and corporation.

Can you say Smack Down?

Excerpts from that article.

 President Barack Obama says he wants to make sure millionaires are taxed at higher rates than their secretaries. 
The data say they already are.


"Warren Buffett's secretary shouldn't pay a higher tax rate than Warren Buffett. There is no justification for it," Obama said as he announced his deficit-reduction plan this week. "It is wrong that in the United States of America, a teacher or a nurse or a construction worker who earns $50,000 should pay higher tax rates than somebody pulling in $50 million."


(And now what I have been saying all along)


On average, the wealthiest people in America pay a lot more taxes than the middle class or the poor, according to private and government data. They pay at a higher rate, and as a group, they contribute a much larger share of the overall taxes collected by the federal government.
The 10 percent of households with the highest incomes pay more than half of all federal taxes. They pay more than 70 percent of federal income taxes, according to the Congressional Budget Office.


 In 2009, 1,470 households filed tax returns with incomes above $1 million yet paid no federal income tax, according to the Internal Revenue Service. But that's less than 1 percent of the nearly 237,000 returns with incomes above $1 million.

This year, households making more than $1 million will pay an average of 29.1 percent of their income in federal taxes, including income taxes, payroll taxes and other taxes, according to the Tax Policy Center, a Washington think tank.

Households making between $50,000 and $75,000 will pay an average of 15 percent of their income in federal taxes.

Lower-income households will pay less. For example, households making between $40,000 and $50,000 will pay an average of 12.5 percent of their income in federal taxes. Households making between $20,000 and $30,000 will pay 5.7 percent. Obama's claim hinges on the fact that, for high-income families and individuals, investment income is often taxed at a lower rate than wages. The top tax rate for dividends and capital gains is 15 percent. The top marginal tax rate for wages is 35 percent, though that is reserved for taxable income above $379,150.
The Tax Policy Center estimates that 46 percent of households, mostly low- and medium-income households, will pay no federal income taxes this year.


Now I am sure most of you who frequent this blog already knew this.
You're all to smart and figured this out the moment Buffett and Obama opened their yappers on this bogus, BS, political banter excuse to of wealth distribution.


Those who don't frequent this blog and had no idea the truth... Wake the hell up or you just might make the same mistake in 2012 like we did (not me) in 2008.

Obama's Rose Garden Review

With most Americans, monthly budgets are the only way to survive to get to the next payday.
Even the unemployed who have it much worse to manage their budgets then most of us do, don't even make it, but sometimes figure it all out.

During today's Rose Garden speech, Obama made this pointed comment that I would like to address here. It is, in my opinion, one of the most telling part of Obama's Rose Garden Speech:

-Washington has to live within its means, the government needs to do what Americans have been doing for years. We have to cut what we can’t afford, to pay for what really matters. 

But as he continued on, he drew to another point during his campaign... I mean, policy speech.
And as I see it, he is asking, on behalf of the Federal Government, for a raise.

-But It's GOT to be a plan that is balanced. A plan that the most fortunate among us must pay their fair share.

Raising taxes!

OK, here is where I want to make one point and one suggestion to America, to what Obama pushed out there today.

Point one:
I'll tell you what this American does to "Live with in our means"
Every month we have bills that have to be paid.
It's required of us, as we hold ourselves responsible, to pay for what we agreed to pay on. Most of us are responsible enough to know what we can afford each month and stay with in the affordability parameter we have set for ourselves with in our budget.

We take our net revenue and subtract our 'Have to's"
If we have anything left over, we either treat ourselves to something nice, or we sock it away to take a nice vacation or put it away for forecasted needs, like a new sofa, a car, or maybe a home we can call our own, as an investment.

Now here is what we cannot do. Something we really have no power or control over.
We CANNOT pass a law that FORCES our employer to pay us more.
We have to earn additional revenues by performance criteria's of how much value we have brought to the betterment of the business.
Normally, the performance reviews are conducted once a year.
We can march in to our bosses office and ask for a raise, but they are under no obligation to oblige.

We the People say the same thing, We are under NO obligation based on Governments performance to oblige your request.

So we live with in our means based on our income at the time. Work hard to perform at what we were hired to do and better ourselves by going above and be on, for the betterment of the business and ones self, in hopes our performance nets us additional income in the future.

As for the Federal Government, I ask them this.

What have YOU done to help make this a better country (company) based on it's founding core principles.
What have you done to go above and be on what you were hired to do by the will of your employer (We the People) to achieve those principles.

My suggestion to all Americans, and maybe this too should become law, or at least a movement.

To the Federal Government, based on your hire date, and will make that July 4th, We the People will do a performance review analysis based on your past year achievements and goals we have set for you as your employer, to better the country.
If you have fallen short of our goals we have set for you of promoting prosperity of the nation (betterment of the Business), you get NO raises (higher taxes) for which to spend of your own accord.

President to Blame the House if "His Jobs Plan" is Blocked

President Obama pretty much tells the nation, if the GOP blocks “His Jobs plan” he’ll take it to the American people, that the unemployment problem in America is the GOP’s fault.

“It’s time that those you sent to Washington start putting country before party. And stop worrying about their jobs and start worrying about yours.”

But listen carefully to Paul Ryan as he explains all the work the House has done since January 2011, and who is REALLY to blame for the continued high unemployment and who IS getting in the way of jobs growth…. The United States Senate.

 

“When the President does things like these, it leads me to believe that he is not in a bi-partisan consensus making mode, he’s in a class warfare and campaign mode and that’s not good for our economy.” And I will add, not good for employment growth, either.


And on the upcoming "Buffett Tax Plan" that Obama will announce tomorrow, Paul Ryan explains what Buffett failed to tell America and what Obama will be using to convince Americans that we need to raise taxes in everyone making over $200K. 

Senator Jim DeMint Calls It Like It Is

What a statement by Senator Jim DeMint on 'On the Record' last night.
Calling Obama a "Venture Socialist" is a large step to get Washingtons elected officials to come right out and admit it.
The comment came at the beginning of the clip and at the 6:00 mark.
He "doesn't like to be disrespectful to our President" he says, but in my opinion thats OK, because Obama has been disrespectful of the American people for too long.

Something we everyday Americans have been saying since 2009.

This is maybe the first time I have heard a sitting Washington DC Senator call Obama what he truly is, a Venture Socialist.

Moore "The War is Over"

This clueless blowhard can't admit we are still at war with Radical Islam.
And that somehow, Osama should have been brought to trial in New York, as "Our basic American Principle" but he feels OBL deserved "OUR" constitutional rights and that it was wrong to kill this evil.

And Elizabeth Hasselbeck schools him on the Nazi angle he takes, in the clip from The View today, that they were defeated, surrendered and brought to trial in the "World Court" at the Nuremberg Trials before the International Military Tribunal. 
But Moore wanted OBL to be brought forth before an American court. Not even Obama (now) buys in to this.



"Less then 100 AQ fighters in Afghanistan"? Yep, they have fled to Sudan and Yemen.
That should be our next targets.
And the FBI has now updated there list of high profile terrorist still walking the earth. Still a hell of a lot of them out there.... But the war is over.. yeah, right!

This is FAR from over, Moore. Anwar al-Awlaki is probably next in line to head Al-Qaida.

The Killing of OBL does not bring this to an end.
The war, contrary to Moore's "opinion", is still being waged until you have weakened your enemy to the point where they can not sustain their objective and give up the fight.

"We built a whole homeland and national security apparatus, spending billion of dollars that has nothing to do with the real threat."
Well if that is the cast then, then WE ARE STILL AT WAR!
What a dips*it!

3 Liberals Finally Crawl Out from Under A Rock!

Here are three rock dwellers:

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY),

Rep Jim Moran (D- VA),



and Hank (Guam will tip over) Johnson (D-GA).



That's right, they must have just crawled out from under a rock! That's because within the past 3 years Americans have been demonstrating in Washington, screaming at town hall meetings, and contacting their Washington representatives about the size of the U.S. 'DEBT' which has skyrocketed out of control under Obama.

AND these three idiots have the nerve to draw up and present a bill that would 'abolish the federal debt ceiling'!

"The debt ceiling is truly arbitrary and has nothing to do with the deficit," Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said in a statement last Wednesday. "The debt ceiling does not prevent the United States from incurring new debts. That occurs when Congress decides to authorize more spending than revenues. The debt ceiling prevents the president from borrowing money to pay those debts when they come due."

Apparently, these tools don't like restraints.

These Liberals want unfettered access to the American Taxpayer's wallet.

These three morons must really think that they are above having to watch what they spend, how they spend and who pays for it.

Apparently, these stooges must drink at the well of the American tax payer and the well is theirs to do with as they desire.

This stupidity is just too incredible to believe!

Fortunately, crazy Nancy is not speaker any longer, otherwise it might have had a chance!

Jobs Bill- Brought to You by... McDermott

Union jobs, mind you.... So says Jim McDermott........



Stupid talking points:

Solar Panels for military operations...Well you know, not everything works....We had Job creators just layoff 30K workers...(is that their fault, or is it they don't know where their next dollar....is going)... If you don't have construction workers out there making $30-$40 an hour...They will not have the money to take home (is the federal government planning to employ 15M people who are unemployed?, my bet is NOT)... We have no way to get groceries to those in the spacelab (WTF was THAT?)...It's ALL infrastructure....

Now if American's are not paying attention, they might miss that this is ALL jobs for "Union workers", which is about less the 7% of the working population of America.

This is what the Dems are trying to sell us....

Paul Krugman Spews His Contempt for the Politically Right...Again!

The rantings from a raging liberal NYT blogger and former Enron advisor, Paul Krugman, has stuck again.

You may remember this douche bag from the Rep. Gabrielle Gifford shooting of January 8, 2011, where Krugman couldn't wait to libel the politically innocent:

"We don’t have proof yet that this was political, but the odds are that it was. She’s been the target of violence before. And for those wondering why a Blue Dog Democrat, the kind Republicans might be able to work with, might be a target, the answer is that she’s a Democrat who survived what was otherwise a GOP sweep in Arizona, precisely because the Republicans nominated a Tea Party activist".

Now, this past Sunday, when Americans were mourning the nearly 3000 people murdered at the hands of Islamics in the name of their Allah, Krugman sends out his tirade of hate for the Politically Right by trying to claim that Rudy Giuliani and George W. Bush profited from being 'fake hero's' during the attacks of 9/11.

Here is Krugman's worthless dribble:

"What happened after 9/11 — and I think even people on the right know this, whether they admit it or not — was deeply shameful. The atrocity should have been a unifying event, but instead it became a wedge issue. Fake heroes like Bernie Kerik, Rudy Giuliani, and, yes, George W. Bush raced to cash in on the horror. And then the attack was used to justify an unrelated war the neocons wanted to fight, for all the wrong reasons.

A lot of other people behaved badly. How many of our professional pundits — people who should have understood very well what was happening — took the easy way out, turning a blind eye to the corruption and lending their support to the hijacking of the atrocity?

The memory of 9/11 has been irrevocably poisoned; it has become an occasion for shame. And in its heart, the nation knows it""""".

I’m not going to allow comments on this post, for obvious reasons"".

What Krugman seems to have lost, like so many other Americans had, is that the events of 9/11/2001 was a 'unifying event'. So why was it not continuous for some Americans? It would seem that politics and hate crept into the years that had passed, very much like Paul Krugman's blog frequently does.

My question is: What did Paul Krugman do on 9/11/2001? Did he run down to the Twin Towers to try and save people? Did he run to the hospital to try and comfort the injured? Did he sit with the relatives of the dead and try to help them with their grief?

Not likely. Why would a liberal hack like Krugman lift a finger to help mankind when it's easier to sit on his rear and libel people that you don't agree with.

Remember, Weep, Honor & Continue to Retaliate!

As we reflect on the events of 10 years ago, one thing we should always tell ourselves, and that is we shall never forget.

I urge you to:

-Tell the story to your children if they were not born at that time.
-Tell the story to your grandchildren or future Grandchildren.
-Pass this story down from generation to generation so it will never die in our heart and in our minds of our fellow Americans who died that day.
-And as you tell the story, please instill in to them who did this to the US.

Don't be afraid to be politically incorrect, because you will only be speaking the truth.
Show them what evil looks like, so they too may learn to recognize it when they see it.

This is the story, no words, just pictures. Pictures that can be very disturbing to look at, but the story must always be told of the realities of life and death, at the hands of radical Islam!

It was told to me from a liberal family member on this the 10th anniversary of 9-11 that took place 10 years ago by these barbarians, and that is....

"When we heard about the first plane striking the tower, I pledge to speak against the National Narrative of vengeance and destruction. I will instead speak of forgiveness, love of all, and a pursuit of compassionate justice."

This attitude, this line of thinking, the self-reflecting of liberal forgiveness is the very SAME line of thinking some reflected on prior to the events of 9-11-2001.

IT'S NAIVE AND DANGEROUS!

May gods compassion and loving touch be with those who died that day, and with their families, friends and with all Americans, and that we shall be victorious in our retaliation to destroy the evil who rained hell upon America.

May justice be swift upon Bin Laden successors.