Tuesday, January 29, 2013

What Is Our Military Doing Down South

With in the last few days, our military, in coordination with local, state and federal law enforcement have been running a "practice drill" over the cities of the US.

One such drill was conducted over the skies of Miami:

The reporter here mentions that the military side of this is for overseas practice and making sure their equipment is in check..... I'll let you ponder that for awhile.

The other "Drill" was over the southern part of Houston, just yesterday:

From this report, it has even been revealed that the nearby elementary school they were flying over, went in to lock down because they were unaware of the "drill".
Now, since the Sandy Hook shooting, you can be assured that the school and their officials are on edge.
But what is odd about this Houston "drill" is why didn't they notify school officials of this drill?
And the Army won't tell the reporter what kind of training they were doing, unlike the one in Miami.

Now, I am not the one to be a conspiracy theorist. I look deeply in to stories that have dropped on my lap. But these two military drills appear to be very odd in the natural aspects of "drills"

Now that you've "pondered" my above comment for awhile, I'll say this:
What could these drills be really all about? Overseas preparation?
Maybe. Maybe to prepare for confrontation with Iran? Or Syria? Or support Egypt in their every other week rioting?
Highly doubtful. Obama's not the one to put boots on the ground. His liberal cohorts would eat him alive.
Plus, why the law enforcement participation?
And why would the military fly over populated US cities just to "make sure their equipment is in check." while firing their machine guns blanks?

Now this story starts to get really weird.
THIS is now being reported from the Texas GOP vote website.

Outrage is growing over news that Obama’s military cuts are going to impact our own homeland security by forcing the Air Force to close a vital air defense system along the ENTIRE southern border of the United States from Florida to California.

This air defense system is known as TARS (Tethered Aerostat Radar System) for which this system protects the southern border of the United States of America by detecting and monitoring low altitude aircraft, and even low altitude missiles.

Why would he do this? The system has been the best of the best at protecting our southern border and waterways. Is he knocking down our southern command defense for an all out assault from hostels?

OR could the drills be a part of a preparation for an economic collapse, when all hell would break loose in our urban areas? Maybe!

OR could it just be all harmless... With what I have brought forth in this post and knowing Obama background with his known associates.... I doubt this is just harmless "drills" 

Monday, January 28, 2013

Adam Lanza Dead Before Shooting-So Says SSDI

This from Genealogy Bank, as set forth by the SSDI:
The websnap below was presented this day, 1/28/2013.

Considering how highly publicized Adam's death was, how in the world could information in the Social Security Death Index pertaining to when Adam Lanza really died be an "error" or a glitch?
And for this date of death to still remain affixed to the social security death index and "Proven", there are only two possibilities here.
Either they put false information in the Social Security Death Index to keep Americans fighting with each other, the coverage of Sandy Hook has been a media/government psyop that's being used to divide the American people against each other...

Or Adam was framed.
Because Adam was already dead when the attacks took place. In which case, Sandy Hook was, in fact, a false flag psyop that's being used as an excuse to limit or take our Arms.

So either way, at this point there is conclusive evidence that the media and the government are using Sandy Hook to wage psychological warfare on the American people.

Adam P. Lanza: Social Security Death Index (SSDI) Death Record

Adam P. Lanza
State of Issue:
New Hampshire
Date of Birth:
Wednesday  April  22, 1992
Date of Death:
Thursday  December  13, 2012
Est. Age at Death:
20 years, 7 months, 21 days

Disclaimer: The Social Security Death Index is made available to the public through a number of websites, including GenealogyBank.com, GenealogyBank is only a host for the Social Security Death Index. As a result, we do not control the information that is provided us in the SSDI.
In order to have information corrected or removed, please contact your local Social Security Administration (SSA) office. Documented proof of an error may be required. Contact information for your local office can be found at http://www.ssa.gov.

Saturday, January 26, 2013

Sheriff Warns, Liberals Looses It

Sheriff David Clarke Urges Americans To Defend Themselves – Liberals Go Ballistic

January 26, 2013
The anti-gun rights movement was dealt a blow this week as a public service announcement by Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke began to circulate in greater numbers – an announcement that is in direct contradiction to the push by the Obama administration and other Big Government activists looking to decimate gun rights in America.

Sheriff Clarke urges citizens not to depend on 911 but rather to become educated on the use of a gun to protect oneself. Some liberals are now demanding Clarke resign his position over what they deem to be irresponsible advice, while gun owners hail him as a much needed voice of reason in the shadow of an Obama administration intent on greatly reducing Americans’ right to own and use firearms in this country.

Friday, January 25, 2013

BREAKING- Obamas Recess Appointments Unconstitutional!

From the Associated Press:

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Barack Obama violated the Constitution when he bypassed the Senate to fill vacancies on a labor relations panel, a federal appeals court panel ruled Friday.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said that Obama did not have the power to make three recess appointments last year to the National Labor Relations Board.

The unanimous decision is an embarrassing setback for the president, who made the appointments after Senate Republicans spent months blocking his choices for an agency they contended was biased in favor of unions.

The ruling also throws into question Obama's recess appointment of Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Cordray's appointment, also made under the recess circumstance, has been challenged in a separate case.

Obama claims he acted properly in the case of the NLRB appointments because the Senate was away for the holidays on a 20-day recess. But the three-judge panel ruled that the Senate technically stayed in session when it was gaveled in and out every few days for so-called "pro forma" sessions.

GOP lawmakers used the tactic - as Democrats have in the past as well - to specifically to prevent the president from using his recess power. GOP lawmakers contend the labor board has been too pro-union in its decisions. They had also vigorously opposed the nomination of Cordray.

The Obama administration is expected to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, but if it stands, it means hundreds of decisions issued by the board over more than a year are invalid. It also would leave the five-member labor board with just one validly appointed member, effectively shutting it down. The board is allowed to issue decisions only when it has at least three sitting members.

On Jan. 4, 2012, Obama appointed Deputy Labor Secretary Sharon Block, union lawyer Richard Griffin and NLRB counsel Terence Flynn to fill vacancies on the NLRB, giving it a full contingent for the first time in more than a year. Block and Griffin are Democrats, while Flynn is a Republican. Flynn stepped down from the board last year.

Obama also appointed Cordray on the same day.

The court's decision is a victory for Republicans and business groups that have been attacking the labor board for issuing a series of decisions and rules that make it easier for the nation's labor unions to organize new members.

Rand Paul- Obama Could Be Running Guns to Jihadists

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., raised questions during a radio interview a few days ago, about whether the Obama administration was smuggling guns to jihadist rebels in a possible “international Fast and Furious” that the White House has tried to cover up.

Speaking with Aaron Klein Investigative Radio on New York’s WABC Radio, Paul said the guns scheme could help explain the reason for the coordinated attacks against the U.S. special mission and CIA annex in Benghazi last September.

Paul: “There is also some concern about whether or not Libyan arms are being ferried through Turkey into Syrian rebels and whether or not that had something to do with the cover-up that came out of the administration when the administration was saying that, ‘Oh, this attack in Benghazi had something to do with a film.’

“Maybe that was to cover up that there was some kind of gun smuggling going on over there, some kind of international fast and furious was going on in Libya and that this was a cover-up,”  
Paul continues. “These are some of the questions that we are going to have for Hillary Clinton when she comes before our committee.

But this question was never posed to Clinton! Why?
Will she return for more testimony? Maybe, if this committee hears testimony about the weapons used in the attack on our conciliate and where they came from... But don't hold your breath! 

After Clinton shocking statement of "What difference does it make" and being that this committee is made up of mostly liberal Senate hacks, this question will never be discovered, I'm afraid! 

Friday, January 18, 2013


I found this intriguing, powerful, moving, inspiring, brave and patriotic.

This, I say, must be shared with all liberty loving, constitutional embressing, people.

The author, is unknown, except for this.
They are our Oath Keepers, and I stand with them in every way, everyday.  


In this dark hour, when liberty is under such relentless assault, it is necessary for you to steel yourselves, and arm yourselves, spiritually, mentally, and physically.  

And above all, it is a time to set aside fear, and to reject despair and to embrace our place in history.  
We were born as Americans, at this time, for a reason, and it was not to cower in fear or to dissolve into a gelatinous mass of despair.  

We were born free men and women, and we will die free men and women.  
No one gets out of here alive anyway, and in the end, all that matters is that our children and grand-children are free.  

Everything else is a side-show.

We will never disarm. 

We will never surrender our military pattern, semi-automatic rifles and the full capacity magazines, parts, and ammunition that go with them.  
The fundamental purpose of the Second Amendment is to preserve the military power of We the People so we will have effective means to resist tyranny. 
Regardless of what unholy, unconstitutional filth issues from the mouths of oath breakers in "Mordor on the Potomac" 
Our answer is MOLON LABE
Our stance will be "Come and take"