How Will Obama React to This Breaking News

So Obama says the war on terrorism is over.

Well not so fast.

Breaking News is the bomber who was preparing to bomb a US bound airline, for which the CIA just thwarted the attack, was in fact an informant for the CIA.

Mr President, the war on terrorism if far from over.

Citizens United v. Fed Election Commission

The landmark decision by the United States Supreme court that the McCain-Feingold act violated free speech was un-presidented ruling that infuriate liberals to no end.

It allows Corporations, millionaires and Unions to donate money, sometimes millions of it to help elect their Candidate.

In his 2010 State of the Union address, Obama said of the decision:

"Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities."

Now we do know that foreign corporations cannot spend without limits. That was upheld.

But now comes a twist to the Presidents remarks on special interest, and I am sure Obama is not saying the same thing today.

A report out by the Associated Press yesterday said Multimillionaire George Soros' contributed $1 million to the advocacy group America Votes and another $1 million pledge to American Bridge 21st Century, an outside "super" political committee supportive of Obama's campaign. 

"As he has in the past, George is focusing his political giving in 2012 on grassroots organizing and holding conservatives accountable for the flawed policies they promote," Soros adviser Michael Vachon said

Flawed policies? Does Vachon mean Capitalism?

"Thanks to investments by progressive leaders like Mr. Soros, we have been able to build a cutting-edge organization that we will continue to build upon in order to keep providing effective and efficient services to the progressive movement," said David Brock, American Bridge's founder.

Oh the Hypocrisy of the left!

So far, GOP super PACs have outraised their Democratic counterparts by tens of millions of dollars.  

So if a liberal/progressive ever rants about McCain-Feingold act and the SCOTUS decision of it, you can slam them with this. They've got no complaints any longer.

Soft America From The Top

What would you say if some enemy combatant, who killed one of your buddies in Afghanistan was released back to his tribe, with just a promise to never raise and aim his weapon at another US solder again? 

That's right, a promise.

I believe you'd be outraged at the notion, right?

Well, it's happening as we speak (or in this case, read)

The Washington Post is reporting on a little known and, for many, surprising U.S. program that reportedly entails releasing high level insurgents in exchange for “peace pledges” outside of normal protocol.

As the United States has unsuccessfully pursued a peace deal with the Taliban, the “strategic release” program has quietly served as a live diplomatic channel, allowing American officials to use prisoners as bargaining chips in restive provinces where military power has reached its limits.
But the releases are an inherent gamble: The freed detainees are often notorious fighters who would not be released under the traditional legal system for military prisoners in Afghanistan. They must promise to give up violence — and U.S. officials warn them that if they are caught attacking American troops, they will be detained once again.
There are no absolute guarantees, however, and officials would not say whether those who have been released under the program have later returned to attack U.S. and Afghan forces once again.

So basically if you're an enemy combatant and you kill another American solder, our nation will arrest you... again.
America has become to soft. These are highly notorious fighters that are being set free to once again, kill our guys. 
Why are they even being set free? Are they not the enemy? What ever happened to detaining them until the end of hostilities?

How about putting a bullet in their freaken heads, for Christ sakes. The ultimate punishment for their breaking of some half assed "promise"

I mean really. Our leadership in Washington doesn't have the stones to be 'American'
Americans don't fu*k around.
Get the job done, and get it done right.

MSNBC Morning Joe Blasts Obama's 'Julia'

The crew on MSNBC Morning Joe attack and are amazed that their man in the oval office is portraying an ideology of social-Marxism, by releasing a web-based ad comparing the life of a fictional caricature, Julia, and how she would fair under Obama, vs. Romney.

The ad (which you will see in the video) shows how an Obama administration would provide for Julia throughout her life, while a Romney admin would, at some point, let her go out in to the world and make it on her own.

One panelist, Brzezinski (who was called a devout Marxist) says "At some point we have to inspire innovation and hope and get them on their way... I don't get it"

Another one comments "This cut in to the grain of the American caricature."

And yet another contributor mentions that "No one, especially a progressive guy like me, what's to see America portrayed that way"

And finally we have "....The fact is that the Federal government is expanding at a frightening rates"

Are they getting this now? Are they understanding what us conservative capitalists have been saying now about Obama's harsh socialist policies.... or are they trying to boost their ratings???

Obama's Afganistan Visit- Troop Rally or Politics

Yesterday, on the one year anniversary of OBL death by the hands of navy Seal 6 team, Obama took to the air to make a special trip to Afghanistan.

Arriving at 12:00 midnight local time, Obama and Afghan President Hamid Karzai signed a strategic partnership agreement pledging U.S. support for Afghanistan for a decade after 2014, when NATO forces are planning to conclude their combat role.

According the administration officials, the main goal of the brief visit was to sign the strategic partnership agreement. But the unconventional timing of events on the trip, such as the signing ceremony at midnight local time, was aimed at allowing Obama to address Americans on a schedule convenient for U.S. television audiences, senior administration officials said. That speech, that ran about 10 minutes, took place at 4 a.m. in Afghanistan.

Earlier, a White House official had claimed the date of the trip was “merely a coincidence”

Merely a Coincidence???
From nearly right out of the gate, Obama brings up the killing of OBLAnd for nearly 4 minutes, he spoke of Bin Laden.But here is an interesting piece from his speech to our nation, from their nation.

In 2002, bin Laden and his lieutenants escaped across the border and established safe-havens in Pakistan. America spent nearly eight years fighting a different war in Iraq.

Obama makes it seem that prior to his election, American troops where only fighting a war in Iraq?

Then Obama goes on to say, this.

And one year ago, from a base here in Afghanistan, our troops launched the operation that killed Osama bin Laden. The goal that I set, to defeat al Qaeda.

A goal that HE SET? He is acting like he has won this war and that it all started from his election. REALLY?

Well we do know, that the information leading our troops to the whereabouts of OBL came from the enhanced interrogation that was approved by then President Bush.

And what does Veterans for a Strong America think? Well here it is!

America knows who deserves the credit for killing Osama Bin Laden - United States Navy SEALs and the American intelligence community. Join with Veterans for a Strong America and let President Obama know who really deserves the credit.