During yesterdays Union Rally in Michigan (I say this with tongue and cheek) Steven Crowder, comedian and Fox News Contributor, was viciously attack by a union thug, (reportedly Tony Camargo, IBEW Local 876, Battle Creek, MI) where Crowder sustained a bruised cheek and chipped tooth.
Now Crowder has given this guy an ultimatum.
Either come forward and face the music of the law, OR get your ass handed to you in a legal.
I've got the hand it to Crowder. The guy can take a punch, and a few hours later, gather himself and call Camergo out.
Let see if Camergo is tough as he thinks he is, and is man enough to face the music!
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Union Thugs Attack in Lansing MI-Update
Anti- Right to Work, Pro-union thugs attack and destroy Americans for Prosperity tent outside the State of Michigan capital this afternoon, when minutes before the Michigan state House of Representatives pass the states right to work bill.
This is what I have been warning about for the last 6 months.
Things are going to get very ugly in our country, when the progressive socialist try and ram down the throats of pro capitalist and pro liberty Americans their socialist agenda.
Teachers in two Michigan education districts today also called off sick to join the protest.
And based on the spelling on their sign here, looks like they could use more education themselves.
This is what I have been warning about for the last 6 months.
Things are going to get very ugly in our country, when the progressive socialist try and ram down the throats of pro capitalist and pro liberty Americans their socialist agenda.
Teachers in two Michigan education districts today also called off sick to join the protest.
And based on the spelling on their sign here, looks like they could use more education themselves.
It's Spelled SNYDER!
______________________Update________________________
Steven Crowder Attacked during the AFP tent distruction by the union jackasses!!!
Powder Dry!!!
______________________Update________________________
Steven Crowder Attacked during the AFP tent distruction by the union jackasses!!!
Powder Dry!!!
Sunday, December 9, 2012
Has Assad Unleached Chemical Weapons On His People Already
First reported on Israel Matzav , video leaking out of Syria shows that Assad has probably already used the Chemical Weapons on his people.
While the world shakes its fingers at Bashar al-Assad warning him not to use chemical weapons in Damascus, the Syrian rebels posted a video on Saturday that shows that either (a) they have a great makeup department, (b) they know how to steal videos and make them their own, or (c) Assad's troops used chemical weapons outside of Aleppo.
Warning: Graphic Images
While the world shakes its fingers at Bashar al-Assad warning him not to use chemical weapons in Damascus, the Syrian rebels posted a video on Saturday that shows that either (a) they have a great makeup department, (b) they know how to steal videos and make them their own, or (c) Assad's troops used chemical weapons outside of Aleppo.
Warning: Graphic Images
Labels:
Assad,
Chemical Weapons,
Syria
Saturday, December 8, 2012
A Look at the Hype of Terrorism in the Eyes of Government
Oathkeepers has republished a detailed listing of what the Feds are doing to combat suspicious activity by anyone, and what could happen to you when you go about yur normal day in your life.
This article as written by Michael Ruppert and originally published at Activist Post.
The sheer number of indicators of potential terrorist activity according to the FBI, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and other government entities is simply staggering. Now we can add the simple act of photography to the list.
Some of the many include:
Ironically, in one case a legitimate report of suspicious activity revealed that the New York Police Department was conducting an illegal surveillance operation outside of their jurisdiction.
When I was tipped off to this latest Roll Call Release by Joe Cadillac, I assumed it was old since as early as 2006 photography was listed as a suspicious activity in a wide variety of contexts.
Furthermore, in 2010 “camera usage at non-tourist sites” and purchasing “camera/surveillance equipment” have been listed as indicators of potential terrorist activity.
Over 25 fliers have been produced by the FBI and Department of Justice alone for specific industries, all of which can be seen here.
It goes on to warn:
However, this is indeed a new release for police, fire EMS and security personnel dated Nov. 13, 2012. It has the seals of the DHS and FBI emblazoned on the top, and was apparently produced in collaboration with the Interagency Threat Assessment and Coordination Group (ITACG), part of the infamous National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC).
“Terrorists and criminals may use photos or videos of potential targets to gain insight into security operations and details of facility operations, including traffic flow through and around facilities, opening times, and access requirements,” states the document, released by Public Intelligence (one of the most useful alternative news sources).
“Photographs and video useful in planning an attack may include facility security devices (surveillance cameras, security locks, metal detectors, jersey walls and planters); security personnel; facility entrances and exits; and other features such as lighting, access routes, gates, roads, walkways, and bridges,” the document adds.
While some of that photography would indeed be quite suspicious, the individuals who compiled the document apparently were only capable of compiling incidents which in fact had nothing to do with terrorist activity whatsoever.
“Although none were ultimately linked to terrorist activity, they are cited as examples for awareness and training purposes,” the document states.
Now you've got to wonder why they are listing incidents that were not linked to terrorist activity or potentially linked to terrorism.....
By far the most absurd of the indicators of potentially suspicious photography includes, “Individuals encountered with photographs of critical infrastructure, iconic buildings, or other sites not of tourist interest.”
The obvious issue here is, “iconic buildings, or other sites not of tourist interest.” Wouldn’t iconic buildings be, by definition, of tourist interest or at least of interest to someone? If not, why would they be iconic?
SO in other words, stay home and if you do venture out, keep your eyes and head straight forward. Don't want you to become a suspect!........
This article as written by Michael Ruppert and originally published at Activist Post.
The sheer number of indicators of potential terrorist activity according to the FBI, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and other government entities is simply staggering. Now we can add the simple act of photography to the list.
Some of the many include:
- Complaining, belief in government conspiracies
- Certain bumper stickers
- Pretty much all bodily movement
- Leaving items behind or requesting privacy at a hotel
- Just about everything else
Ironically, in one case a legitimate report of suspicious activity revealed that the New York Police Department was conducting an illegal surveillance operation outside of their jurisdiction.
When I was tipped off to this latest Roll Call Release by Joe Cadillac, I assumed it was old since as early as 2006 photography was listed as a suspicious activity in a wide variety of contexts.
Furthermore, in 2010 “camera usage at non-tourist sites” and purchasing “camera/surveillance equipment” have been listed as indicators of potential terrorist activity.
Over 25 fliers have been produced by the FBI and Department of Justice alone for specific industries, all of which can be seen here.
It goes on to warn:
However, this is indeed a new release for police, fire EMS and security personnel dated Nov. 13, 2012. It has the seals of the DHS and FBI emblazoned on the top, and was apparently produced in collaboration with the Interagency Threat Assessment and Coordination Group (ITACG), part of the infamous National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC).
“Terrorists and criminals may use photos or videos of potential targets to gain insight into security operations and details of facility operations, including traffic flow through and around facilities, opening times, and access requirements,” states the document, released by Public Intelligence (one of the most useful alternative news sources).
“Photographs and video useful in planning an attack may include facility security devices (surveillance cameras, security locks, metal detectors, jersey walls and planters); security personnel; facility entrances and exits; and other features such as lighting, access routes, gates, roads, walkways, and bridges,” the document adds.
While some of that photography would indeed be quite suspicious, the individuals who compiled the document apparently were only capable of compiling incidents which in fact had nothing to do with terrorist activity whatsoever.
“Although none were ultimately linked to terrorist activity, they are cited as examples for awareness and training purposes,” the document states.
Now you've got to wonder why they are listing incidents that were not linked to terrorist activity or potentially linked to terrorism.....
By far the most absurd of the indicators of potentially suspicious photography includes, “Individuals encountered with photographs of critical infrastructure, iconic buildings, or other sites not of tourist interest.”
The obvious issue here is, “iconic buildings, or other sites not of tourist interest.” Wouldn’t iconic buildings be, by definition, of tourist interest or at least of interest to someone? If not, why would they be iconic?
SO in other words, stay home and if you do venture out, keep your eyes and head straight forward. Don't want you to become a suspect!........
Monday, December 3, 2012
Once Again NBC spews anti-US Constitution Propaganda
You've all probably heard about this over the last 24 hours or so, but it is worth repeating.
Bob Costa spews his anti-2nd amendment rights plea for gun control during his weekly commentary on “Sunday Night Football.”
Commenting on the weekend murder-suicide by Kansas City Chiefs linebacker Jovan Belcher, Costas relied on a column by writer Jason Whitlock, formerly of the Kansas City Star, to make a gun-control argument.
Bob Costa spews his anti-2nd amendment rights plea for gun control during his weekly commentary on “Sunday Night Football.”
Commenting on the weekend murder-suicide by Kansas City Chiefs linebacker Jovan Belcher, Costas relied on a column by writer Jason Whitlock, formerly of the Kansas City Star, to make a gun-control argument.
But what Costa and Whitlock failed to bring forth is that it wasn't the gun that killed Belcher wife, and subsequently Belcher himself.
NO!
Someone has to pull the trigger. That someone was Jovan Belcher.
It's the mind that actually makes this fateful decisions. One that is troubled and unbalanced.
Why should one mans actions hinder the rest of us, the millions of gun owner in our nation, to be without our constitutional right to keep and bear?
So this tragedy, the murder/suicide, was carried out by a gun owner who was troubled within his own self.
Should the death of Nicole Simpson be any different? Should we ban all knifes, now?
Or should we ban duck tape, as in the case of the death of little Caylee Anthony?
I don't hear that coming from the likes of Costa.
Whitlock was a football player. So was Belcher. And Costa, a Sports analyst. The game binds them together.
For certain this was a sad, sad tragic event, and Whitlock and Costa loss are understandable.
But to lay blame on the object, and not the troubled person, is not being realistic of reality.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
