Saturday, February 11, 2012

Obama Backs Off His Circumvention of the 1st Amendment

Or did he?

Yesterday, Obama relaxed his HHS demands that religious institution must provide "preventative medicine" aka birth control and the morning after pill, to their employee's healthcare policy and pay for it.

In a statement release yesterday, Obama said:

"Whether you're a teacher or a small businesswoman or a nurse or a janitor, no woman's 's health should depend on who she is, or where she works, or how much money she makes, it's a core principle"
"As a citizen and as a Christian I cherish this right," Obama said. "I saw that local churches did more good for a community than a government program ever could."


"Religious organizations won't have to pay for these services, and no religious institution will have to provide these services directly."
 First off, WHO's core principle?

Second, take "no woman's 's health should depend on who she is, or where she works, or how much money she makes" and change it to "no woman's tax rate should depend on who she is, or where she works, or how much money she makes" Then we have something there.

Third, "as a Christian I cherish this right" If he truly cherished that right, why then did he fight this for so long? Why did he flip flop when Biden and Penneta urged him not to go there,  and then once HHS Kathleen Sebelius got her claws in to him, he abandon the "Cherished right"?

Lastly, keyword in his last statement...."Directly". Based on the "compromise" woman who work for the catholic institutions can go directly to the insurance company and request these pills, for free. So who pays for it?
Answer: Those who have insurance policies in these institutions (and outside those institutions) as the insurance provider will hide the cost in their premiums. Thats how the cost of free stuff is accounted for.
Also, keep in mind, that you have to get a prescription to get these pills directly from the insurer. Who has to write these prescriptions? Doctors. Some who might work for the catholic institutions.

So as you can see, this is no compromise. It's a shell game.

7 comments:

Silverfiddle said...

He didn't.

AdamsPatriot said...

As he says woman's health core Principle!

So how can birth control be tied to a woman's positive health, when birth control pills are linked to breast cancer, which devastates a woman's body and can kill her?

This basis of this rule is no different than abortion, liberals make excuses why there needed and then globalize it beyond theses reasons.

In reality, it's about genocide and population control.

The liberals continue to show their true intent with rules and legislation like this, which is to subvert and destroy the constitution to expand their addiction to power and spread their tyranny!

AdamsPatriot said...

BTW, he is not a Christian, as he continues to say.
A Christian would not subvert the teachings of their religion and force his selfish ideology on all other Christians.

Those that force others to follow their perversion and distorted views are the followers of Islam.

Obama has reveled long ago that in the end he will side with the Muslim.

Mark Adams said...

So I was right, looks as if they have set their policy of stomping on the constitution
“Our position is clear. We have set out our policy.”

AdamsPatriot said...

This is such BS!

This is 2012, since when do women NOT have access to birth control?

Even Catholic women have access if they choose to go against the teachings of their religion.

Liberals want government to stay out of the bedroom when it comes to the gay lifestyle, but the liberals are OK with getting government into the bedroom when it comes to religious freedom!

Silverfiddle said...

BTW, he is not a Christian, as he continues to say.

And he's no "constitutional scholar" either...

Calling Obama a constitutional scholar is like calling a termite a home builder.

Mark Adams said...

More like a constitutional butcher, is more like it, Kurt.