Thursday, May 27, 2010

Never Forget- Always appreciate

As we go out this coming weekend to enjoy the official start of summer, please take one moment out of your fun and remember those who went on before us and gave the ultimate sacrifice for our freedom. They're the men and women who died in battle for our nation, our liberty, our true way of life and well being.
May they continue to be honored and glorified not only in their life, but in heaven.
I have seen Arlington National Cemetery once in my life and what a humbling experience.
It brought a lump in my throat and a tear to my eye to the point of wanting to walk up to each and every headstone and thank them personally for what they did for ME. And you, my fellow Americans.

I am perplexed that our President, the Commander-n-Chief doesn't have the same respect for our fallen brethren, as he will be on vacation, in Chicago. And will not lay the wreath at the tome of the un-known soldier. As most predecessor before him have.

President Obama is not my President, he is the enemy of each and every one of those lying in Arlington as he would rather come to Chicago and hang with his mentors in Chicago style Politics then to pay respect to our heroes.

I, for one will take more time this Memorial Weekend to thank all the men and women who have fought to maintain what freedoms we have left.

God Bless America and all who love her!
Have a blessed weekend!

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Nugent takes the...2nd....Literally

Ted Nugent. The Motor City Madman, the Call of the Wild(man), has got a Cat Scratch Fever for the 2nd Amendment. Ted is a Rock-N-Roll American Patriot. He has been at numerous Tea Party rallies, an outspoken citizen for the US Constitution and an advocate for "restoring the roar" of America might, wealth and prosperity.
Here, Ted talks to PBS about the second amendment.
I can't say I disagree with him one bit.

I love his last line. Can you say 'Nail on the head'!!!

Saturday, May 22, 2010

Coup Against Obama?

As re-posted by TPM, and they claimed that Newsmax publish the follow article and then removed it from it's website, for what reason would NewsMax remove this article?
Are they concerned of the backlash from the Government for maybe making this an idea? Who knows.
Am I afraid to re-post  this piece....Not On Bit!!!
Matter of fact, is this a possibility, a realistic possibility?
If it will stop the socialization of America, the AP-DP says this might be a possibility.

What do YOU think?

Obama Risks a Domestic Military Intervention By: John L. Perry
There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America's military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the "Obama problem." Don't dismiss it as unrealistic.
America isn't the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn't mean it wont. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes:
# Officers swear to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to "obey the orders of the president of the United States."
# Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized.
# They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office.
# They can see that the economy -- ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation -- is financially reliant on foreign lender governments.
# They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home.
# They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America's troop strength is allowed to sag.
# They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.
# They can see the nation's safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before.
So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you do?
Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan's arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam?
Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran's nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World?
What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, "I'm not interested in victory") that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse?
Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims?
Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the intellect and conscience of America's military leadership is lost in a fool's fog.
Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a "family intervention," with some form of limited, shared responsibility?
Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making.
Military intervention is what Obama's exponentially accelerating agenda for "fundamental change" toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama's radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible.
Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don't shrug and say, "We can always worry about that later."
In the 2008 election, that was the wistful, self-indulgent, indifferent reliance on abnegation of personal responsibility that has sunk the nation into this morass.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Joint session of Congress-Traders of the nation

This is the most vile, disgusting and sickening display by a joint session of Congress that I have ever seen in my lifetime. The Presidents cabinet, all 254 Democrat Representatives and 58 Democrat Senators applaud, and in most cases, give a standing ovation to Mexico President Calderon when he stood before our elected officials in the US House of Representatives and denounce one of our States and it's new immigration Law. A Law that duplicates the Federal immigration law and that is far more conservative then the Mexican immigration law.

These are the true enemies of America, people.

They hate America and will never stand beside her.

The Democrat Party should never, ever, be allowed to hold public office in this nation again!!!
They are repulsive and I would just as well banish them from our nation then to live with them as my fellow Americans.

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Obama-Brennen to toss Israel under the bus

In an insane and unheard of move Obama's Deputy National 'Security Adviser' John Brennan told an audience yesterday that the Obama Administration wants to reach out to the “moderate” elements of the Hezbollah terror group. Hezbollah is funded by Iran and its goal is to destroy Israel.
Brennen feels they are a emerging power to reckon with, and garners our attention and reach out, to build up..... Even though they are the very same group who killed 241 American solders in Beirut Lebanon on October 23, 1983. And rained terror over a 30 year period on Israel.
Brennen says "Hezbollah is a very interest organization"
This is sicking, this disgusting, this is TREASON!
The President and he advisory team needs to be removed from office!

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Obama finger pointing at everyone... but himself

President Barack Obama on Tuesday accused Republicans of trying to score political points by attempting to block his economic policies but insisted that his agenda was working.

With public anxiety over high unemployment threatening Obama's Democrats in November's congressional elections, he used a visit to the U.S. "Rust Belt" to strike back at his critics, charging that their (republicans) efforts to obstruct him had held back his recovery program.

But the President party has a nearly super majority in Congress. So how can he blame that on the Republicans?
Didn't they pass a recovery bill, a stimulus act and sign it in to law?
Could it be that the Presidents "recovery program", aka the 'stimulus', just doesn't work?

Obama continues: "If the just-say-no crowd had won out ... we'd be in a deeper world of hurt than we are right now,"
We are still in a HUGE world of hurt, it will continues. For you see, you can't permanently stop the bleeding by spending more of the peoples money. 

Debt got us into this mess. More debt will prolong it for the foreseeable future. 
My suggestion to the President, look east to Greece. This is our future. It's coming. The only way to stop it, is STOP SPENDING!
Obama touted his stimulus agenda for putting the overall economy back on firmer footing and boosting job creation but acknowledged that not everyone was feeling the benefits.

Not everyone? Is he referring to the nearly 10% unemployed? What has the stimulus done? Saved the banks who are not lending much anymore and holding American tax dollars hostage.
Is that a recovery? Maybe for the banks. Maybe for the Dems, What about the rest of the country?

Read this double speak here...:
"Now, we've got a long way to go before this recovery is felt in the lives of all our neighbors," he said. 
WHAT THE F**K? How many times have you heard this over the past year? To many times. Lot of talk, no action.

Republicans opposed Obama's stimulus plan and continue to criticize it as a wasteful government overreach.
"For all we've gotten done despite the unified, determined opposition of one party, just imagine how much farther along we could be if we worked together. And I truly believe it's not too late for us to work together."

Drop the socialist agenda, then the right will talk and work together with the Dems.
The Right will not be blamed for the political direction and the fundamental "change" the Democrats are talking the nation. Americans DO NOT LIKE IT. 
And the Republicans (not all, mind you) are smart not to fall in line
Winds of change are coming. It happened in Virgina, It happened in New Jersey, it happen in Massachusetts and NOW in Pennsylvania. 
The shots across the bow are becoming for frequent.
Ask Mr Spector. He's out and so is the left in November.

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Kagan 'Violated the Law' on Military Recruiting

-The Drudge Report has reported that Kagan 'Violated the Law' on Military Recruiting, according to Jeff Sessions.

The Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Jeff Sessions, R-AL, seized on Elena Kagan’s role in prohibiting military recruiting on Harvard's campus during her tenure as the dean of Harvard Law School in an exclusive "This Week" interview and called it “no little-bitty matter.” He insisted that Kagan was not only wrong in her decision, but broke the law. Sessions was joined by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Senator Patrick Leahy, D-VT, who called the issue “sound and fury signifying nothing.”
The controversy revolves around Kagan’s decision to prohibit military recruiting directly on the law school’s campus because the military’s “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” policy, prohibiting gays from openly serving in the armed forces, violated Harvard Law School’s anti-discrimination policy.  When the Supreme Court ruled that a law tying federal funding of schools to military recruiting was constitutional, Kagan allowed military recruiting on campus on Harvard again so the school wouldn’t lose funding.

Asked about the issue by host Jake Tapper, Sessions said, “This is no little-bitty matter, Jake. She would not let them come to the area that does the recruiting on the campus. They had to meet with some student veterans, and this is not acceptable. It was a big error,” he said. “That went on for a number of years. It was a national issue. People still remember the debate about it.”
“She reversed the policy. When she became dean, they were allowing the military to come back on campus and had been for a couple of years,” Sessions said.
Leahy insisted that the whole affair was much ado about nothing. “Well, this is like in Shakespeare,” he said.  “Sound and fury signifying nothing.  She -- the recruiters were always on the Harvard campus.  She's shown her respect for the veterans there. … Recruiting went on at Harvard every single day throughout the time she was -- she was there,” Leahy said. 
Sessions strongly disagreed:  “She disallowed them from the normal recruitment process on campus. She went out of her way to do so,” he told Tapper. “She was a national leader in that, and she violated the law of the United States at various points in the process.”
Other Republican voices have been even sharper. “She, as Dean of the Harvard Law School, took an effort to block the American military from the Harvard campus all the way to the Supreme Court during a war,” former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich said last night an NRA convention.  “And that is an act so unbecoming of an American that she should be disqualified from the very beginning,” he said."

-Even if she hadn't, I still don't think she shouldn't even be considered to sit on the highest court in the land. She has never sat on a bench as a judge before nor handed down judgments on the interpretation of the law.-

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Morgan Hill Parents let Admin have an ear full

About 200 people packed the auditorium since it was their first chance to speak to, and in some cases, yell at district leaders. This stemming from when the Principle went overboard when five high school students who wore their patriot tee shirt to school but were told to either take off the American flag t-shirts they were wearing or go home.
A few notes from parents and citizens comments:
" I want to see the Principle and Vice Principle fired or you WILL see legal action"
"I'm personally of getting very very tired of disrespect to that flag and actually what this nation stands for. "

Americans are pushing back at the over reaching, overbearing liberal left in our nation.
They are to be commended.

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Los Angeles to Boycott Arizona

Today, there is one American city Los Angeles (LA) which 'chooses' to ignore federal law and create a boycott against other American cities and the State of Arizona (AZ), which 'chooses to embrace and follow a federal law.

The law concerns people who are not citizens of this country and break our laws to come into America. These people are rightly named illegals.

The feds (which are required by the U.S. Constitution to protect our borders and American citizens) won't help the state of AZ control the problem of illegal border crossings. This in turn has caused an explosion of criminal activity within the state of AZ, hurt their economy and their citizens.

Now an American city wants to further cause harm to another state because of AZ's choice to follow the law.

Why are Americans not standing together on this issue or at least let AZ handle their situation without any outside comments?

Why are Americans fighting one another over foreign law breakers?

Why aren't the foreign law breakers not following American federal law and go through the 'proper' channels to come into this country?

I can not begin to understand how American elected officials could be so irresponsible to a neighboring State, their own state's Constitution, and the U.S. Constitution, and federal law then cause further harm to Americans over foreign law breakers and non tax paying free loaders.

It would seem to me that LA has more to loose on this boycott deal than AZ does!!!!!!!!!!

It would seem that one could call for a reverse-boycott of LA and California as a whole by no longer going to the movies and supporting the film industry which is huge in California.

It would seem that this reverse-boycott would hurt many in that industry, including the prima donnas that star in these movies. The City of LA has thousands of tax paying homeowners and consumers that are employed by the film industry. Should they not be employed, because no one is buying their stuff, then that would hurt the tax coffers in LA and CA in general.

If movie patrons were to drastically drop out of going to the movies, renting DVDs, buying DVDs, buying Hollywood related fashion wear, no longer watch any program on TV produced in California including the Award shows and other TV specials and basically anything in California would this effect the Cities in California?

Could a LA/CA reverse-boycott help to persuade the elected officials in that state to withdraw their boycott of Arizona and shut the hell up?

It would seem that California, in it's attempt to attack another American State, has far more to lose than Arizona.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

WWII Vet- Let'R rip

This venerable and much honored WW II vet is well known in Hawaii
for his seventy-plus years of service to patriotic organizations and causes all over the country. A humble man without a political bone in his body, he has never spoken out before about a government official, until now. He dictated this letter to a friend, signed it and mailed it to the president.
"Dear President Obama,

My name is Harold Estes, approaching 95 on December 13 of this year. People meeting me for the first time don't believe my age because I remain wrinkle free and pretty much mentally alert.

I enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1934 and served proudly before, during and after WW II retiring as a Master Chief Bos'n Mate. Now I live in a "rest home" located on the western end of Pearl Harbor , allowing me to keep alive the memories of 23 years of service to my country.

One of the benefits of my age, perhaps the only one, is to speak my mind, blunt and direct even to the head man.

So here goes.

I am amazed, angry and determined not to see my country die before I do, but you seem hell bent not to grant me that wish.

I can't figure out what country you are the president of.
You fly around the world telling our friends and enemies despicable lies like:

" We're no longer a Christian nation"

" America is arrogant" - (Your wife even announced to the world," America is mean-

spirited. " Please tell her to try preaching that nonsense to 23 generations of our war dead buried all over the globe who died for no other reason than to free a whole lot of strangers from tyranny and hopelessness.)

I'd say shame on the both of you, but I don't think you like America, nor do I see an ounce of gratefulness in anything you do, for the obvious gifts this country has given you. To be without shame or gratefulness is a dangerous thing for a man sitting in the White House.

After 9/11 you said," America hasn't lived up to her ideals."

Which ones did you mean? Was it the notion of personal liberty that 11,000 farmers and shopkeepers died for to win independence from the British? Or maybe the ideal that no man should be a slave to another man, that 500,000 men died for in the Civil War? I hope you didn't mean the ideal 470,000 fathers, brothers, husbands, and a lot of fellas I knew personally died for in WWII, because we felt real strongly about not letting any nation push us around, because we stand for freedom.

I don't think you mean the ideal that says equality is better than discrimination. You know the one that a whole lot of white people understood when they helped to get you elected.

Take a little advice from a very old geezer, young man.

Shape up and start acting like an American. If you don't, I'll do what I can to see you get shipped out of that fancy rental on Pennsylvania Avenue .. You were elected to lead not to bow, apologize and kiss the hands of murderers and corrupt leaders who still treat their people like slaves.

And just who do you think you are telling the American people not to jump to conclusions and condemn that Muslim major who killed 13 of his fellow soldiers and wounded dozens more. You mean you don't want us to do what you did when that white cop used force to subdue that black college professor in Massachusetts , who was putting up a fight? You don't mind offending the police calling them stupid but you don't want us to offend Muslim fanatics by calling them what they are, terrorists.

One more thing. I realize you never served in the military and never had to defend your country with your life, but you're the Commander-in-Chief now, son. Do your job. When your battle-hardened field General asks you for 40,000 more troops to complete the mission, give them to him. But if you're not in this fight to win, then get out. The life of one American soldier is not worth the best political strategy you're thinking of.

You could be our greatest president because you face the greatest challenge ever presented to any president.
You're not going to restore American greatness by bringing back our bloated economy. That's not our greatest threat. Losing the heart and soul of who we are as Americans is our big fight now.
And I sure as hell don't want to think my president is the enemy in this final battle...

Harold B. Estes "

Snopes confirms as true:

Got to Love it! One Hell of a American Patriot!! Spread the Word!

Monday, May 10, 2010

Obama is Inspired... By Alinsky

Obama is inspiring the violence and protest of the new Arizona immigration law, as is the left, because that's all they have left to push back with. Race!
They have nothing left in the arsenal of Saul Alinsky playbook.
There is no justification for this President to misrepresent the AZ law. There no proof of race attack by the right, nor racial profiling, but they will say it over and over again to make themselves believe it, so others will follow.

You really need to read Saul Alinsky book "Rules for Radicals", as Obama is following like a fish to a lour, and as Alinsky calls on:
"Organizing to the current generation of young activists, largely drawing upon his own experiences. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our young people. They will not continue to be relatively passive and slightly challenging. If we fail to communicate with them, if we don't encourage them to form alliances with us, they will move to the right. Maybe they will anyway, but let's not let it happen by default."

The bold words are exactly what Obama is doing on this and many current issues.

You can adhear Alinsky and Obama and todays current hot bed issues with Alinsky's 11 rules (keep these in mind when debating issues with liberals:

  • Rule 1: Power is not only what you have, but what an opponent thinks you have. If your organization is small, hide your numbers (in other words, lie) in the dark and raise a din that will make everyone think you have many more people than you do.
  • Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people. The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
  • Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent.(in other words Race bait) Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.
  • Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. “You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”
  • Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.
  • Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. “If your people aren’t having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.”
  • Rule 7: A tactic that drags on for too long becomes a drag. Commitment may become ritualistic as people turn to other issues.
  • Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage.” (This is what happened in the 2008 Presidential election)
  • Rule 9: The threat is more terrifying than the thing itself. (Race baiting) When Alinsky leaked word that large numbers of poor people were going to tie up the washrooms of O’Hare Airport, Chicago city authorities quickly agreed to act on a longstanding commitment to a ghetto organization. They imagined the mayhem as thousands of passengers poured off airplanes to discover every washroom occupied. Then they imagined the international embarrassment and the damage to the city’s reputation.
  • Rule 10: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Avoid being trapped by an opponent or an interviewer who says, “Okay, what would you do?”
  • Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. (can you say Tea Party?) Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.

That last bold sentence is directly out of the left playbook for the Nov election. they still plan on using Bush as an attack trigger.
These rules however are NOT one sided, and can be used to bring down a liberal to their knees by reversing the rule. Turn the rule around on them. they have no defense for this.
Happy liberal hunting.

Sunday, May 9, 2010

Racial Hypocrisy In American Politics

Racial hypocrisy in American Politics, the sound bite of the left mixed with a spin to cover their own racial injustice and manipulations.

Take Arizona's recent laws to ask for legal resident identification of anyone during 'justified' law enforcement interaction and because of this the State and the Arizona Governor have been labeled Racists by 'activists' and politicians on the left.

But where is the outrage of the other States that take action to control the illegal activity within their Oklahoma. In 2007 Oklahoma passed a law to incarcerate illegals and in 2009 Oklahoma passed a law to collect DNA samples from illegals for the Oklahoma data base for criminal purposes. Also, they passed a law that all drivers licences be printed only in English.

But we do not see the level of outrage, rioting and protests organized by Unions and Socialist organization as there was for Arizona. No, not a one. Could it be that the Governor of Oklahoma is Democrat while Arizona's is Republican?

Why are business' demonized and called greedy by our Nations Leaders for hiring illegals and accused of fueling the illegal border crossings? But when a business does not hire these same people the business is called racist!

Why are the police judged by our political leaders and deemed to have acted 'stupidly' when the incident is reported racial in nature but the truth of the incident is not clearly understood yet?

Why are ordinary American citizens that have an opposing point of view to the left and wish it to be heard judged racist merely for being in a crowd that is 'mostly white'?

Why are ordinary American citizens that have an opposing point of view to the left and wish it to be heard called 'Uncle Toms' merely for being black in a crowd of mostly whites in which they agree with?

Why are those on the left that have actually caused a racial divide in one manner or another not called out by the left as racist? In fact, they are given a pass and a language translation to another meaning that makes your head spin.

Our Federal laws that were violated by foreign people are not enforced by our Federal Leaders. Those same Federal Leaders took an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and are charged with protecting American citizens. Our Federal politicians continuously create a spin to cover their own selfish political ambitions...which is to get more votes from people they 'claim' to support so they can maintain 'Political Power'.

America and American's have been greatly hurt by this selfish political weapon of racial division. America's true leaders need to stand up and denounce this weapon and continue to act towards demoralizing the weapon's impact.

Those that don't could find themselves being label racist, for their contribution to racially dividing America.

The future of America is changing in many respects and for the good. In the future, there is no place in politics for those who put personal ambitions above those they serve. There is no place in politics for liars and manipulators. There is no place in politics for those who seek to destroy the U.S. Constitution. And above all, there is no place in politics for a weapon of racial division.

The hero's of this country are those that stand up for what they really believe, those that swear an oath and stand by it, those that will protect their charges whatever the personal price and those who have offered their life to protect American Freedoms... regardless of the skin color.

Saturday, May 8, 2010

Time to be prepared to defend the nation

A LA School teacher calls for Mexican Revolt in US to bring down Capitalism.
This is treasonous talk and insighting. Will LA school district fire this Teacher?
This is the kind of education our children are subject to.
Your tax dollars are paying this guys salary.
Alls I can say to this Teacher is "Bring it on Bitch!" We kicked your ass in the Mexican-American war, we'll do it again.

"Where we now stand is stolen, occupied Mexico"....Calif. tax dollars at work. More gems: 'Communist Revolution', 'Frail, racist white people', 'La Raza' (the Race), Fidel Castro, 'Northern Front of Latin Revolution'..."40 the belly of the beast". "Our enemy is Capitalism and Imperialism". Sedition anyone?

"We are revolutionary Mexican organization here. We understand that this is not just about Mexico. Its about a global struggle against imperialism and capitalism At the forefront of this revolutionary movement is La Raza. We will no longer fall for these lies called borders. We see America as a northern front of a revolutionary movement Our enemy is capitalism and imperialism."

Friday, May 7, 2010

Presidents Hypocrisy at an all time high.

At a Cinco de Mayo reception at the White House Wednesday evening, President Obama launched another attack on Arizona's new immigration law. "We can't start singling out people because of who they look like,

or how they talk,

or how they dress,"

the president told the crowd.
Note to the Prez... Your minions are frothing at the mouth about the Tea Party movement, but the above pictures of Americans have been called every name in the book.

But then you have the audacity to lecture Americans a few days ago?
On top of calling these people in the pictures, TeaBaggers?
 Please, go tell it to the people of Kenya.

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

No News is NOT good News

As first reported yesterday, here on Bonsai on the Right, and now picked up by Gateway Pundit, the Arizona Governor office yesterday received a letter in the mail that had a white powdery substance inside.

The AZ legislature recently pass a strong (and needed) immigration bill the AZ Governor signed in to law. This backs up the US immigration laws already on the books.
There has been many protest recently about the new law, and the protest have been somewhat peaceful, but not all.

So, today I thought I would Google this to see how many in the media have reported this story about the letter received by the AZ Governors office.
This is a snapshot of my results....

Guess what, none have reported this, except the local news outlets.

Only other 'News' website (on a national level) out there that is reporting on this is Fox Nation.

Pretty sad when something like a possible terrorist attack on a sitting Governors office is not reported.
It's true, the American media is the lamestreammedia

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

GM, like Obama: You Lie!!!

GM's claims that it has repaid back Taxpayers with interest from the money GM got as a bailout is the biggest bunch of BS.
This is why.......

The Competitive Enterprise Institute today filed a formal complaint with the Federal Trade Commission, arguing that General Motors misleadingly claimed in a national TV ad that the company has paid back taxpayer bailout loans.
In the complaint, CEI urges the FTC to investigate the GM ad campaign entitled “GM Repaid Government Loan Ahead of Schedule.” The ad features GM’s Chairman and CEO, Ed Whitacre, who declares that “we have repaid our government loan in full, with interest, five years ahead of the original schedule.”
That claim, CEI explains in the complaint, “gives the false impression that GM has used its own funds to pay back all the bailout money that it received from the federal government. In fact, GM has only repaid a fraction of those funds—barely ten percent. Moreover, GM apparently repaid its loan by using other federal funds.”
To add insult to injury, GM’s misleading ad could unfairly dupe consumers into a false, renewed confidence in the company, the complaint explains. “Consumer purchasing decisions can easily be affected by such considerations, as the FTC has long recognized in prohibiting false claims that products are ‘Made in the U.S.A.’”
Sam Kazman, CEI General Counsel, points out the real-world absurdity of GM’s claim. “If I applied for a car loan using GM’s financially misleading approach, I’d be tossed out of the dealership on my ear.”
“GM might argue that its ad is literally accurate, but the fact is it’s completely misleading,” said Hans Bader, CEI counsel.
CEI urges the FTC to promptly investigate, to “serve the American public on this issue of major consumer and taxpayer importance [and] “discourage other beneficiaries of government bailouts from falsely misrepresenting their status.”

And just for shits a giggles, there is this.

Until GM buys out out the Feds, this blogger will never buy a GM again.

Sunday, May 2, 2010

Taliban Claimed Responsibility For Times Square Car Bomb

As reported by Gateway Pundit & Bill Roggio top Pakistani Taliban commander took credit for yesterday’s failed car bomb attack in New York City…
And, released a video statement before the failed attempt last night in Times Square.

The Long War Journal reported:
A top Pakistani Taliban commander took credit for yesterday’s failed car bomb attack in New York City.
Qari Hussain Mehsud, the top bomb maker for the Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan, said he takes “fully responsibility for the recent attack in the USA.” Qari Hussain made the claim on an audiotape accompanied by images that was released on a YouTube website that calls itself the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan News Channel.
The tape has yet to be verified, but US intelligence officials contacted by The Long War Journal believe it is legitimate. The Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan News Channel on YouTube was created on April 30. Officials believe it was created to announce the Times Square attack, and Qari Hussain’s statement was pre-recorded.
The video has since been taken down by YouTube.

Another Terrorist attempt?

Could this be another attempt by terrorist at an attack on American soil? Could be.
But will have to wait and see what the DHS says. Even though they have to many things going on in the Gulf of Mexico with an oil spill. Oil spill???

Wonder what the DHS has to do with an oil spill and why is Janet Napolitano heading down to the Gulf.

Lets see if she makes what almost happened in NYC last night more of a priority then an oil spill. Unless the explosion on the Oil rig was a terrorist attack.

Police found an "amateurish" but potentially powerful bomb that apparently began to detonate but did not explode in a smoking sport utility vehicle in Times Square, authorities said Sunday.
Thousands of tourists were cleared from the streets for 10 hours after two vendors alerted police to the suspicious vehicle, which contained three propane tanks, fireworks, two filled 5-gallon gasoline containers, and two clocks with batteries, electrical wire and other components, Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said.
"We avoided what could have been a very deadly event," Mayor Michael Bloomberg said. "It certainly could have exploded and had a pretty big fire and a decent amount of explosive impact."
The bomb appeared to be starting to detonate but malfunctioned, top police spokesman Paul Browne said Sunday. Firefighters and witnesses said they heard a popping sound from inside the vehicle.
Bloomberg called the explosive device "amateurish" but potentially deadly, noting: "We are very lucky."
The NYPD bomb squad "has seen sophisticated devices before and they described this one as crude," Browne said. "But it was nevertheless lethal." If detonated properly, it could have created a large fireball and sprayed shrapnel — metal from the propane tanks and car parts — that could have killed pedestrians in the immediate vicinity, Browne said.

The full story is here from AP

We are not safe with Obama, Pelosi, Reid & Co running this country. Seems like history is repeating itself with an Administration more focused on hijacking our economy than keeping us safe.

Saturday, May 1, 2010

Ariz. Deputy Shot; Illegal Immigrants Suspected - Ariz. Deputy Shot; Illegal Immigrants Suspected

If this doesn't raise the Federal Government illegal immigration flag, I don't know what will.
An Arizona Deputy has been shot and wounded trying to stop illegal immigrants and drugs from getting in to our country.

Pinal County Deputy Louie Puroll was patrolling alone Friday afternoon in a rugged area near Interstate 8, about 50 miles south of Phoenix, when he came upon a band of suspected smugglers, authorities said.
At least one of five suspects opened fire on the 53-year-old lawman, tearing a chunk of skin from just above his left kidney. The officer was found after a frantic hourlong search, Pinal County sheriff's Lt. Tamatha Villar said.
The wound was not serious and Puroll was released Friday night from Casa Grande Regional Medical Center
You can read the whole story on Fox News Website.
Are you listening, Mr President?