Monday, October 31, 2011

Move-on Takes Out Ad to Rip One Of Their Own

The multibillionaire venture capitalist George Soros funded Move-on.org created and aired this ad last Friday, ripping one of their own, Mayor Jean Quan, calling her actions to break up the Occupy Oakland an attempt to take away their right to peaceful assembly.


Watch:


The right to "PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY"?

According to this young lady from the Oakland demonstration, it was far from being a "peaceful" assemble.



People of this movement, I have a warning for you.

You use the 1st amendment to essentially call for social justice in American, and calling for Government to intercede in to Capitalism to bring it down to institute "change" to a "fairer" system. But this is what happens when you call for a revolution. Socialists minded authority will take the constitutional rights away to answer your demand, but it will be on a much larger scale.

7 comments:

Christopher - Conservative Perspective said...

So 'Tear Gas' is now called a "chemical weapon". Sure, technically it is but previous to this "report" I had not heard it being described as such.

Further, does this "occupier" also want riot gear or does she wish that the police shed theirs so her bottles and rocks can do the damage she intends? Which by the way would have invited a much more stronger reaction than tear gas mind you.

Mark Adams said...

I was wondering if someone was going to bring that up, Christopher. I am surprised they didn't call it WMD's!
The move on ad just got shoved right back in their face with the "peaceful protest" claim.

But, like you said what did she expect for law enforcement to do? Stand there with nothing to protect themselves?
Ever been hit with a rock or glass bottles?
Those can be lethal weapons!!

Chris said...

The MSM keeps saying that these protests are peaceful. Maybe they think if they keep saying it and not showing the truth no one will notice?

These people warrant tea gas and riot gear. The Tea Party didn't need anything but police protection from these same liberals. 1/3 of the OWS protesters think violence from protesters is warranted. That is a whole lot of violent Obama supporters.

Silverfiddle said...

Yeah, Christopher, that is a good one, calling tear gas a chemical weapon...

What morons. Thankfully, I think ordinary Americans are seeing through all this drug-addled nonsense.

Mark Adams said...

Chris, thats because they truly believe they are peaceful and that law enforcement is the one to blame. Most in the MSM are reliving their glorious radical 60's hippy days. I am sure they are probably sitting around the water cooler now a days, twisting one up and sharing the doobies.

Unfortunately, Silver in most polls, Americans don't even know what this is really all about. I had to explain this to my 23 year old daughter what it was all about. She heard about it but had no idea what was behind it. Now that she knows, she's against the message they are portraying.

Reaganite Republican said...

From now till Nov 2012 comes the great time for us political spectators, where the Left eat their own young and turn on each other as their power implodes and they enter long-term political oblivion

I'm going to LOVE this

reddfroge said...

Found on another blog and so very true.

Mooch is ready to spew her bilious disgust with America on the campaign trail. A dignified, transcendent first lady? No chance. Michelle is going to break with a hundred years of tradition and play the role of attack dog, heaping derision on her husband’s political opponents like no other first lady before her.
And it’s already begun.

Mad Michelle this week popped down to Davis Island, Fla., to hobnob with the very people her husband despises - the 1 percent. At a massive mansion on the bay, filled with the wealthiest of the wealthy, America’s first lady launched into a tirade about “them” - the Republicans.

“Let’s not forget about what it meant when my husband appointed two brilliant Supreme Court justices, and for the first time in history, our daughters - and our sons - watched three women take their seats on our nation’s highest court. But more importantly, let’s not forget the impact their decisions will have on our lives for decades to come - on our privacy and our security, on whether we can speak freely, worship openly and love whomever we choose. That is what’s at stake here,” she said to applause.

Yes, Republicans hope to regain the White House so they can install Supreme Court justices who will trample Americans’ privacy, ignore the nation’s security, crush free speech and persecute the religious.