A Dual Post- Adams Patriot & Mark Adams
As it once was, striking at a sovereign nation, for any reason was the lefts battle cry to bring down a President and smear his legacy.
We all know who that was: Bush
But was this Bush's policy?
Or an agreed and adapted policy from the former Administration of Bill Clinton?
Answer points to yes.
December 19, 1998 President Clinton speaks to the role of American and British troops fighting to generate Iraqi compliance with UN Security Council (UNSC) resolutions. The President announces that U.S. policy toward Iraq would seek the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime from power.
And by October 31, 1998 President Clinton signs into law H.R. 4655, the "Iraq Liberation Act of 1998."
The Act was passed 360-38 in the House and by unanimous consent of the Senate.
And so the result: Mission Accomplished.
Now we have a similar:
Gadhafi took control of Libya in 1969 through a military coop, similar to the way most dictators do. Now 42 years later the left refers to him as 'not the legitimate ruler'.
The left says Gadhafi is now killing his own citizens, but he has done that for 42 years now. What other dictator has done that? Saddam Hussein did and the left thought that was a one of many poor reasons to invade Iraq.
The rebels are no different than Gadhafi as they are doing what he did, try to take the country by force.
Isn't Libya, under Gadhafi, a sovereign nation? They are in a civil war, why is that our problem or the UN's? Now we are in this when the rebels are loosing! So we are helping the rebels overthrow their government?
Our President is not on the fore front of this action, but leaves this to lower personnel. The Pentagon said no to this action and then Obama leaves the country before the invasion, does not seek approval by congress, goes against the left ideology on war and the left legitimizes the invasion of libya as being part of a coalition with the UN.
The left says Gadhafi is now killing his own citizens, but he has done that for 42 years now. What other dictator has done that? Saddam Hussein did and the left thought that was a one of many poor reasons to invade Iraq.
The rebels are no different than Gadhafi as they are doing what he did, try to take the country by force.
Isn't Libya, under Gadhafi, a sovereign nation? They are in a civil war, why is that our problem or the UN's? Now we are in this when the rebels are loosing! So we are helping the rebels overthrow their government?
Our President is not on the fore front of this action, but leaves this to lower personnel. The Pentagon said no to this action and then Obama leaves the country before the invasion, does not seek approval by congress, goes against the left ideology on war and the left legitimizes the invasion of libya as being part of a coalition with the UN.
Still Is:
Can you name the Nobel Peace Prize winner who fired 110 Tomahawk cruise missiles?
Is the leftwing and the MSM outraged that their missiah-n-chief is helping liberate a people?
Crickets thus far are loudest on this.
Nothing from the NY Times.
Nor the Washington Post.
Arianna Huffington's Humping-the-post deflects away from Libya and talks about Afghanistan and would-be GOP Presidential contenders.
The biggest Obama lover, MoveOn.Org has said nothing at this point.
And the biggest war hypocrite of them all, Cody Pink has set an event calendar to go after (their) war criminals, but guess who's not on the list?
