Friday, October 26, 2012

Benghazi- Unkown Attack or Pre-planned

With all the coverage of the terrorist attack at our consulate in Benghazi, and the subsequent fallout on the Obama Administration of who knew what, and when did they know it, there is a new twist to this story, for which if held to be true, would be an act of treason, coming from the highest echelons of our Government.

The following video is an eye opener and presented to us by WesternJournalism.com 

First the timeline of events, emails and statements made that we all know about.


The last half is where it gets interesting!
 (You can click off the ad, if it appears)

Now this could all be a conspiracy theory at this point, as I have yet to find info about the Libyan News connecting Morsi at this, but then this breaking from Fox News. (via Gateway Pundit)




Fox News has learned from sources who were on the ground in Benghazi that an urgent request from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on the U.S. Consulate and subsequent attack several hours later was denied by U.S. officials — who also told the CIA operators twice to “stand down” rather than help the ambassador’s team when shots were heard at approximately 9:40 p.m. in Benghazi on Sept. 11.

Former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods was part of a small team who was at the CIA annex about a mile from the U.S. Consulate where Ambassador Chris Stevens and his team came under attack. When he and others heard the shots fired, they informed their higher-ups at the annex to tell them what they were hearing and requested permission to go to the consulate and help out. They were told to “stand down,” according to sources familiar with the exchange. Soon after, they were again told to “stand down.”
Why, when they knew the consulate was under attack, did they deny that help be sent?
Could it be that this was the plan all along. To kidnap Stevens and then exchange him for the blind Sheik, as Obama's October Surprise?

------------------------------------UPDATE-------------------------------------

2 comments:

Right Truth said...

The theory has been out there since day one that the kidnapping of the ambassador may have been a set up between Washington, Egypt, and Libya... That the ambassador would then be exchanged for the blind sheik. But something went terrible wrong.

The terrorists were not satisfied with simply taking the ambassador.

The Obama administration did not expect the SEALS to disobey three orders to stand down.

They Obama administration did not expect the SEALS to fight to the death.

They did not anticipate that their ambassador might actually get hurt or killed.

They did not expect that the information concerning them denying requests for assistance from the former SEALS would get out to the public and the families of all 4 killed.

They DID expect that the lap dog media would report only what they told them, (a YouTube movie, no ability to get help, not knowing what was going on in real time...)

While all of this was theory at first, it seems it may have some validity to it now.

Time will tell. It is criminal.


Debbie
Right Truth
http://www.righttruth.typepad.com

Mark Adams said...

I think this will move this in to a new realm of investigation that will make Watergate look like child’s play.
The new revelations are opening up legitimate speculation, RT.