Paul Krugman Spews His Contempt for the Politically Right...Again!

The rantings from a raging liberal NYT blogger and former Enron advisor, Paul Krugman, has stuck again.

You may remember this douche bag from the Rep. Gabrielle Gifford shooting of January 8, 2011, where Krugman couldn't wait to libel the politically innocent:

"We don’t have proof yet that this was political, but the odds are that it was. She’s been the target of violence before. And for those wondering why a Blue Dog Democrat, the kind Republicans might be able to work with, might be a target, the answer is that she’s a Democrat who survived what was otherwise a GOP sweep in Arizona, precisely because the Republicans nominated a Tea Party activist".

Now, this past Sunday, when Americans were mourning the nearly 3000 people murdered at the hands of Islamics in the name of their Allah, Krugman sends out his tirade of hate for the Politically Right by trying to claim that Rudy Giuliani and George W. Bush profited from being 'fake hero's' during the attacks of 9/11.

Here is Krugman's worthless dribble:

"What happened after 9/11 — and I think even people on the right know this, whether they admit it or not — was deeply shameful. The atrocity should have been a unifying event, but instead it became a wedge issue. Fake heroes like Bernie Kerik, Rudy Giuliani, and, yes, George W. Bush raced to cash in on the horror. And then the attack was used to justify an unrelated war the neocons wanted to fight, for all the wrong reasons.

A lot of other people behaved badly. How many of our professional pundits — people who should have understood very well what was happening — took the easy way out, turning a blind eye to the corruption and lending their support to the hijacking of the atrocity?

The memory of 9/11 has been irrevocably poisoned; it has become an occasion for shame. And in its heart, the nation knows it""""".

I’m not going to allow comments on this post, for obvious reasons"".

What Krugman seems to have lost, like so many other Americans had, is that the events of 9/11/2001 was a 'unifying event'. So why was it not continuous for some Americans? It would seem that politics and hate crept into the years that had passed, very much like Paul Krugman's blog frequently does.

My question is: What did Paul Krugman do on 9/11/2001? Did he run down to the Twin Towers to try and save people? Did he run to the hospital to try and comfort the injured? Did he sit with the relatives of the dead and try to help them with their grief?

Not likely. Why would a liberal hack like Krugman lift a finger to help mankind when it's easier to sit on his rear and libel people that you don't agree with.