tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post5897715457251466862..comments2023-10-12T06:11:48.315-05:00Comments on Defenders of Prosperity: McCaskill: Time for Americans to Take Up PitchforksAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comBlogger19125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-76277707691523186202010-12-07T14:08:09.057-06:002010-12-07T14:08:09.057-06:00"No one outside of middle school uses yearly ..."No one outside of middle school uses yearly averages in determining this stuff."<br />So why then did you use yearly averages in your post about the Clinton years that is above AP's post?<br /><br />Why does the BLS utilize yearly averages?<br />http://www.bls.gov/cps/prev_yrs.htm<br />.....<br /><br />"THE REPUBLICANS AVERAGED .35 % OVER 6 YEARS"<br />No, they average Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-17220952387561328042010-12-07T12:37:45.678-06:002010-12-07T12:37:45.678-06:00Mark are you f-ingjoking?
Yearly averages. No on...Mark are you f-ingjoking? <br /><br />Yearly averages. No one outside of middle school uses yearly averages in determining this stuff. <br /><br />Get real. Use real stats, not bullshit averages. <br /><br />AND HERE'S THE BEST PART OF YOUR STATS...THE REPUBLICANS AVERAGED .35 % OVER 6 YEARS....lmao<br /><br />THE DEMOCRATS AVERAGED (YOU'LL LOVE THIS).4666 A HIGHER AVERAGE PER YEAR. <br /Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-31593578880415026132010-12-06T16:04:11.721-06:002010-12-06T16:04:11.721-06:00You need to count your apples again, son.
1992 7....You need to count your apples again, son.<br /><br />1992 7.5 Dems Control(starting point)<br />Clinton years<br />1993 6.9 Dems Control –0.6<br />1994 6.1 Dems Control -0.8<br />+1.4% net gain<br />Ave 6.5%<br /><br />1995 5.6 Rep Control +0.5<br />1996 5.4 Rep Control +0.2<br />1997 4.9 Rep Control +0.5<br />1998 4.5 Rep Control +0.4<br />1999 4.2 Rep Control +0.3<br />2000 4.0 Rep Control +0.2Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-11044921945358617942010-12-06T09:48:04.422-06:002010-12-06T09:48:04.422-06:00Mark lets be honest and use the entire spectrum of...Mark lets be honest and use the entire spectrum of the Clinton years. <br /><br />1-93 Clinton and Democrat congress elected 7.3%<br />1-95 Republican congress elected 5.60% <br /><br />1.8 % drop under all dems<br /><br />1-97 still republican 5.3<br /><br />.3% drop under republican congress<br /><br />1-99 still republican 4.3 <br />1 % drop<br /><br />1-2001 4.2<br /><br />.1 percent drop<br Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-48980628595592251102010-12-05T16:50:58.756-06:002010-12-05T16:50:58.756-06:00"Not two months after asking us for more mone..."Not two months after asking us for more monetary concessions they gave monetary bonus's to salary. Should i be supportive of that? Should i be thankful?"<br /><br />Do you still have a job???<br />Yes... Be thankful.<br />I don't get bonuses, but some hire ups do. And I don't care, because I work my ass off and don't complain about what others get. I do my job as Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-66284834592542446422010-12-05T14:25:30.517-06:002010-12-05T14:25:30.517-06:00Joe these contracts will be a little different for...Joe these contracts will be a little different for Ford vs. the other two. For one if Ford makes money after they pay off their taxes the UAW memebers may have some leverage. But if the other two aren't making money it might be a different story. Now that GM has stock holders again it might be hard to give into the UAW as easily. We'll see what happens. But if I was you I'd thank God Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12905362327313044045noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-80814977809267246352010-12-05T12:00:28.011-06:002010-12-05T12:00:28.011-06:00BTW, when Missourians took up everything just shor...BTW, when Missourians took up everything just short of 'PITCHFORKS' during the town hall meetings that McCaskill presided over...she was appauld that the little people (middle class) would be upset over what McCaskill was cramming down their throats!<br /><br />I guess we need to take her advice during the next town hall meeting that she is at...and bring our pitchforks!<br /><br />I'AdamsPatriothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07882392107988103781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-47400767004291567302010-12-05T11:20:41.864-06:002010-12-05T11:20:41.864-06:00Mark,
Those links are written by people alot smart...Mark,<br />Those links are written by people alot smarter in the field of economic than you or I, yet you will stick to your little anecdotal chart. LMMFAO. <br /><br />Your basically an idiot. I hate to use that language but you point to 1.4 percent off the unemployment rate as working. nevermind that economic growth was the lowest in years, or that the average person made less by the time Bush Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-84624769003336260242010-12-05T11:03:29.659-06:002010-12-05T11:03:29.659-06:00Mark, we haven't walked off the line in 34 yea...Mark, we haven't walked off the line in 34 years. In fact we have worked through every single negotiation without a strike the entire time i have been at Ford Motor. Some have taken months. <br /><br />If you must know we haven't had a local contract for a couple years now and we are operating on the old one without a strike or mention of a strike. While we have had a National contract Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-65790418774006333872010-12-05T10:55:02.839-06:002010-12-05T10:55:02.839-06:00All good points here AP. Nice!
Straight from a bu...All good points here AP. Nice! <br />Straight from a business owner constituent with in McCaskills home state. <br />And, I saw Up-Chuck Schumer. He didn't even flinch at McCaskill's 'Pitchfork' commentAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-12280495214214614812010-12-05T10:15:13.504-06:002010-12-05T10:15:13.504-06:001. Who sets the platform, those who control the ho...1. Who sets the platform, those who control the house.<br />Reid in the Senate quickly brought only the House bill, which extends only the middle-class tax cuts to the Senate floor.<br />The Independence know if you allow taxes to go up on the job creators, high unemployment will remain. Hell Joe, even 20 Dems know this in the House and voted with the Republicans on this.<br /><br />#2 Sorry Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-15060432276560576412010-12-05T09:39:25.460-06:002010-12-05T09:39:25.460-06:00McCaskill's message in this video is a farce.
...McCaskill's message in this video is a farce.<br /><br />I am a middle class business owner here in Missouri, the state McCaskill is suppose to represent. She has never represented my interests nor the interests of Middle Class Missourians.<br /><br />It was the middle class (not Millionaires) that went to many town hall meetings and told McCaskill NOT to vote for certain bills, like the AdamsPatriothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07882392107988103781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-76538898209134195732010-12-05T07:25:22.955-06:002010-12-05T07:25:22.955-06:00Mark,
1. The two bills are not gimmicks, they are ...Mark,<br />1. The two bills are not gimmicks, they are the platform. Keeping tax cuts for the middle class and letting them expire for the rich. The right can sign on or protect the rich, but when it comes down to it, the right will lose. Middle class Independents won't care about the rights philosophical beliefs, just that their tax cuts didn't get renewed. <br /><br />2. Never said Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-4241135732708910382010-12-04T15:09:17.484-06:002010-12-04T15:09:17.484-06:00Joe, you the most dishonest person here calling me...Joe, you the most dishonest person here calling me "dishonist". We have yet to be "dangerous" or "violent" like you on the left tried to pin on us. The left have been very buisy though being violent,rioting and calling for more violence. It was you Joe that said the right was calling for violence with our revolution II flags. Why Joe have you changed your dishonest Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12905362327313044045noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-6344899911720387212010-12-04T11:23:03.330-06:002010-12-04T11:23:03.330-06:00Joe, in answer to:
#1 It's a political tactic ...Joe, in answer to:<br />#1 It's a political tactic by the Dems to make it appear the right is voting down to stop a tax increase on the middle class. But Americans are not buy it.<br />#2 I never claimed it would cut taxes, I said "Keep Tax cuts for ALL AMERICANS" Keyword there is KEEP. And I posted those RINO's in a previous post with regards to the earmarks. But I see you Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-21367239157991500282010-12-04T10:49:22.834-06:002010-12-04T10:49:22.834-06:00Chris, I am sure George Soros's busy little as...Chris, I am sure George Soros's busy little associates are feverishly transposing Soros diction in to word for word talking points. <br />I'd be willing to bet Soros is calling for such an event(s) to take place.<br /><br />McCaskill surely didn't like the Tea Party showing up on the Hills last March to yell down Pelosi and the Dems as the marched in to the House to take a vote on theAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-41595458074317386232010-12-04T09:10:31.434-06:002010-12-04T09:10:31.434-06:00Chris, you weren't condemning it when the righ...Chris, you weren't condemning it when the right was doing it. More intellectual dishonesty from ya. <br /><br />She shouldn't be using that langauge. Its wrong to suggest that people should storm Castle Frankenstein just because Count Rove and Boehnerstein live there.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-66016508818650918142010-12-04T09:07:52.616-06:002010-12-04T09:07:52.616-06:00since your criticizing Claire can i stand in for h...since your criticizing Claire can i stand in for her and rebutt?<br /><br />#1. the Democrats have two bills one that would leave the tax cuts for those under 250,000 and one for those under 1 million. Neither will get enough votes to pass. So in truth the right is voting against tax cuts for the middle class in order to protect the richest Americans. She's being on honest and truthful. <br Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-69547687590662108472010-12-04T07:26:26.418-06:002010-12-04T07:26:26.418-06:00It is amazing how much left wing violence ridden r...It is amazing how much left wing violence ridden retoric the left are pushing right now. It seems as though every left wing media is calling for this. It's funny how they all speak with one voice. The voice of George Soros. And the mindless zombies do Soros' bidding without question.Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12905362327313044045noreply@blogger.com