tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post3216723522370246183..comments2023-10-12T06:11:48.315-05:00Comments on Defenders of Prosperity: John Lewis Needs Schooling on ConstitutionAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comBlogger21125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-77696835163513075792011-01-25T12:45:02.922-06:002011-01-25T12:45:02.922-06:00Joe, I find your retort here both amusing and hypo...Joe, I find your retort here both amusing and hypocritical as with your comments on the next blog post: 'The Ten Poorest Cities In The USA'.<br /><br />Apparently, you don't, in the remotest sense, practice what you preach.AdamsPatriothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07882392107988103781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-25880695885854904432011-01-25T11:36:40.230-06:002011-01-25T11:36:40.230-06:00"I can't imagine just what context you ar..."I can't imagine just what context you are using it in, so I guess, (by the 'standards' of the left) welcome to the Tea Party!<br /><br />Notice that you never ASKED what the context was in your answer."<br /><br />Joe, you stuck your neck on for that ridicule. It's not up to Adams to ask the question, it's up to you to clarify your remarks when anyone sees a commentAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-66651902575508153742011-01-25T10:34:38.446-06:002011-01-25T10:34:38.446-06:00Adams,
Your right on one thing, it was a partisan ...Adams,<br />Your right on one thing, it was a partisan blast. Even someone as thoughtful as i sometimes engages in petty partisanship withe the rest of the posters here. Its hard to rise above the constant attacks and sometimes i don't. <br /><br />As for my reference to pubic hair, i thought as active as you and Mark were that you'd be up on things. Guess one of the talking heads must Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-18751753690628751202011-01-25T10:27:59.125-06:002011-01-25T10:27:59.125-06:00Adams,
Again i will repeat anyone interested in so...Adams,<br />Again i will repeat anyone interested in solely finding out the answer to a question would ask the question without first making a very descriptive remark about what it could be. Like this.<br /><br />Adams says, "Joe, what is the context for that?"<br /><br />Joe says, "Adams it refers to the testimony of Anita Hill and the pubic hair on a can of coke accusation."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-17245968011318594162011-01-24T14:13:17.965-06:002011-01-24T14:13:17.965-06:00"we know that bigots have been involved with ..."we know that bigots have been involved with Tea Party members"<br />That right there just discredited your comment. You DON'T know, because it's speculation and the idea draw in some peoples minds by the left to discredit the TPP.<br />All because we have an black president... but we also had a female Speaker and old white guy for Senate majority leader that the TPP spoke out Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-30329346485065238182011-01-24T14:07:18.831-06:002011-01-24T14:07:18.831-06:00I hide behind nothing, you put the possiblities ou...I hide behind nothing, you put the possiblities out there through an unreasonble snipe, deal with it!<br /><br />Your hypocrisy concerning the Tea Party vs the blatant racism by the Left leaves you exposed.<br /><br />Tea Party racism is a figment of the lefts hate filled imagination, while the facts of the left's racisim is documented.<br /><br />In another POV on context, one raises the AdamsPatriothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07882392107988103781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-53344151899458025642011-01-24T13:19:15.106-06:002011-01-24T13:19:15.106-06:00Adams,
Since we know that bigots have been involve...Adams,<br />Since we know that bigots have been involved with Tea Party members and their campaigns i will take it that you intended to question my character. <br /><br />One would not raise the specter of possible context if one did not intend to create the possibility that it existed. <br /><br />You can hide behind the semantical innocence of what you did, but the reality is you put a Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-39471262993860717202011-01-24T11:45:12.317-06:002011-01-24T11:45:12.317-06:00Joe, frequently, you come on this blog and spin th...Joe, frequently, you come on this blog and spin the postings to fit your liberal POV. You post comments on this blog blasting others who you claim are Partisan and do not quantify or put their comments in context.<br /><br />Now, you make a ‘partisan’ comment (“So i'll give John Lewis a pass till Alito, Scalia, John Roberts and ole "pubic hair" Thomas all learn the Constitution AdamsPatriothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07882392107988103781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-72284659972949317012011-01-24T06:35:19.739-06:002011-01-24T06:35:19.739-06:00So you are saying is that only individuals have th...So you are saying is that only individuals have the rights of the constitution. All others forms are null and void.<br />This attitude is what the 111th had, but in a more harsher attitude and it pissed of the country.<br />We, meaning left right, might have our differences and compromise, but when it comes to the constitution thats were we are to draw the line of compromise.<br />You say 'Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-82358355429437540352011-01-23T22:01:06.309-06:002011-01-23T22:01:06.309-06:00Mark,
First off. I made my point clear enough and ...Mark,<br />First off. I made my point clear enough and i don't believe its going to change. So we can agree to disagree then right?<br /><br />Second, I don't believe that Unions have the same rights as people do.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-32711523134211581432011-01-23T21:24:25.358-06:002011-01-23T21:24:25.358-06:00Amazing. You can apologize to me later.
Because ...Amazing. You can apologize to me later. <br /><br />Because you can't remember that Anita Hill accused Clarence Thomas of saying, "Who has pubic hair on my Coke?" you can't fathom the context of my "pubic hair" Thomas blast?<br /><br />Try Google next time...Type in Thomas, pubic hair. You'll get these for context.<br /><br />Clarence Thomas, Anita Hill, and Pubic Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-1412995198820088052011-01-23T09:46:17.480-06:002011-01-23T09:46:17.480-06:00Joe, 'ole "pubic hair" Thomas', ...Joe, 'ole "pubic hair" Thomas', I haven't heared that since my high school days in the Detroit area.<br />Then, that was used in context of a racist remark about a black person and their nappy type of hair on their head.<br />I can't imagine just what context you are using it in, so I guess, (by the 'standards' of the left) welcome to the Tea Party!AdamsPatriothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07882392107988103781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-45994461888572128122011-01-22T20:31:09.355-06:002011-01-22T20:31:09.355-06:00Joe, let examine the text, shall we.
"Congres...Joe, let examine the text, shall we.<br />"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. "<br /><br />"or abridging the freedom of speech"<br />key wordAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-43228821231958581342011-01-22T16:08:53.877-06:002011-01-22T16:08:53.877-06:00Mark, you and i will always differ on that, becaus...Mark, you and i will always differ on that, because i feel the inclusion of corporations isn't in the intent of the 1st Amendments and to this i point to the entire text. <br /><br />Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-49597847606554724862011-01-22T10:56:33.254-06:002011-01-22T10:56:33.254-06:00Joe, you and I have been around the block on this ...Joe, you and I have been around the block on this Citizens United decision before. And a strict constitutionalist would agree with this decision because the strict wording does not point to people, nor corporations in freedom of speech as it does say "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech"<br /><br />When Lewis says "equal protection under the law" when Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-25263960830421285532011-01-22T10:18:23.221-06:002011-01-22T10:18:23.221-06:00Good one Mark.
I caught the same thing on Chris&#...Good one Mark.<br /><br />I caught the same thing on Chris's blog a few weeks back and showed where the right was using the Declaration instead of the constitution. <br /><br /><br />Unfortunatly, using the words of the Constitution instead of the SC's interpretation<br />of it can lead you of the path of correctness. Even republicans have accepted certain understandings of the words as Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-17111216406629906772011-01-21T08:40:54.270-06:002011-01-21T08:40:54.270-06:00I just craped my pants laughing at the watering jo...I just craped my pants laughing at the watering joke. That was as funny as I've heared. Thanks for the laugh.Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12905362327313044045noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-62144302926472758602011-01-21T06:59:46.350-06:002011-01-21T06:59:46.350-06:00LOL, RR.
Glad to see some of those on the right in...LOL, RR.<br />Glad to see some of those on the right in congress are carrying a copy of the constitution in their pocket.<br />I guess Rep Lewis must of missed the first day at class of the 112th when the constitution was read out loud on the house floor.<br />This is why the Speaker had done this.<br />Guess they should have had a test afterwords.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-20449825503046844342011-01-21T06:55:39.596-06:002011-01-21T06:55:39.596-06:00"and they do not know what is in either"..."and they do not know what is in either"<br />One excellent point, Christopher.<br />Comments by the left are using the 14th Amendment and quote the constitution, but if you are not paying attention, they'll change one word to win there argument. As did Rep Lewis when he change 'of' and replaced it 'under'. One word can change the meaning of a sentence.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-83152863611675389532011-01-21T06:32:55.209-06:002011-01-21T06:32:55.209-06:00If this guy were any dumber he'd need to be wa...If this guy were any dumber he'd need to be watered once a week lolReaganite Independenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17538767328058148689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-22672052808818470652011-01-21T03:35:25.018-06:002011-01-21T03:35:25.018-06:00Mark, Lewis is but just one who needs schooling sa...Mark, Lewis is but just one who needs schooling sadly.<br /><br />The crazy thing is that we in the Tea Party movement were beaten over the heads by liberals with comments berating us about wanting to pay attention to the Constitution. And now that that very document pertains as we suggested it did the liberals all of the sudden think they know it and want to talk about it?<br /><br />The problemChristopher - Conservative Perspectivehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14102651466203156040noreply@blogger.com