tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post1490199221882471856..comments2023-10-12T06:11:48.315-05:00Comments on Defenders of Prosperity: Florida Judge Rules Obamacare UnconstitutionalAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-33645367882348648652011-02-02T11:28:58.202-06:002011-02-02T11:28:58.202-06:00Now finally on to your argument concern the CSA. T...Now finally on to your argument concern the CSA. The fact is that criminalization is in regulation and that Scalia and the other 5 justices found that Congress had a broad mandate to regulate Drugs it felt were illicit through the Commerce Clause. I'm not sure what your trying to prove, but i get the feeling you agree with the criminalization of Medical marihjuana as a constitutionally Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-25150950214602221412011-02-02T10:29:15.088-06:002011-02-02T10:29:15.088-06:00As for who he cites your correct that he sites the...As for who he cites your correct that he sites the Federalist papers, but your intentionally avoiding my argument that he also sites authors other than than the founders.<br /><br />1. Robert H. Bork & Daniel E. Troy,Locating the Boundaries: The Scope of Congress’s Power to Regulate Commerce<br /><br />2. Randy E. Barnett, The Original Meaningof the Commerce Clause, 68 U. Chi. L. Rev. 101, Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-47130648705467797492011-02-02T10:08:30.318-06:002011-02-02T10:08:30.318-06:00Mark,
Thanks for making my argument for me, along...Mark, <br />Thanks for making my argument for me, along with looking foolish in the attempt to debate my point. It was extremely nice of you to do that. I didn't expect it but i do appreciate it. <br /><br />And as far as the cost of the uninsured i do expect you to believe that the costs are passed on to the consumer and the taxpayers. I do, not because I believe it but because its true. <brAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-27848805847950221642011-02-01T21:25:14.849-06:002011-02-01T21:25:14.849-06:00JHC Joe that is the most pathetic excuse I have he...JHC Joe that is the most pathetic excuse I have heard to date "lack of health insurance creates costs associated with the uninsured"<br />BS. You don't expect me to believe that someone going in to the ER for treatment, that the hospital sends the bill to some insurance company, do you?<br /><br />Look at his opinion. HE SITES THE FEDERALIST PAPERS and JAMES MADISON.<br /><br />I&#Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-17498027922324065692011-02-01T19:23:22.798-06:002011-02-01T19:23:22.798-06:00Mark, wow you really got that wrong didn't you...Mark, wow you really got that wrong didn't you.<br />Gonzales v. Raich is the decision that allows Congress to regulate the Controlled substance act not the other way around. <br /><br />That the court case revolved around whether or not the federal government had the constitutional authority to override the State of California's laws, not whether the drug was on the "Controlled Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-76736387003949809872011-02-01T12:55:07.350-06:002011-02-01T12:55:07.350-06:00Mark, you are spot on! Joe is trying to spin the d...Mark, you are spot on! Joe is trying to spin the decision by drawing a parallel that has no resemblance to logic.<br /><br />Today, the WH have made a comment that mirrors Pollacks comment on 'activism'.<br /><br />Clearly, the President and other liberal leaders that align with him, cannot comprehend the Constitution nor uphold it as their ideology and desperation for power over the AdamsPatriothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07882392107988103781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-47105653353749301812011-02-01T11:37:11.078-06:002011-02-01T11:37:11.078-06:00“Gonzales v. Raich- “marijuana is not sold and is ...“Gonzales v. Raich- “marijuana is not sold and is not in any part of commerce that it had a right to regulate it.”<br />The ruling was based on two factors. One that it’s an illegal substance because The Controlled Substances Act does not recognize the medical use of marijuana. And two, the government may regulate personal cultivation and consumption of the crops. THOSE are activities. So there Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-2501570101475723702011-02-01T10:32:39.383-06:002011-02-01T10:32:39.383-06:00And having read Judge Vinson's opinion i am li...And having read Judge Vinson's opinion i am likely to agree that he was not only guilty of judicial activism, but that he was happy to do it. It seems that he felt the right to challenge the previous rulings of the Supreme Court as if he was capable of doing so. I am not sure that the judicial prudence of a circuit court judge is above the precedence of the supreme court. <br /><br />I also Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-19666781650314159912011-02-01T07:12:12.512-06:002011-02-01T07:12:12.512-06:00You know what i find hilarious about this case and...You know what i find hilarious about this case and others is that it all hinges on a judges view of a "Inactivity" and the invocation of the Commerce Clause. <br /><br />But in the Steeh affirmation the judge uses a recent (2005) court case Gonzales v. Raich in which the government argued that even if medical marijuana is not sold and is not in any part of commerce that it had a right Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-59562707794345368212011-01-31T23:25:43.642-06:002011-01-31T23:25:43.642-06:00How can following the constitution be judicial act...How can following the constitution be judicial activism unless you don't believe what has been our governing document for over 200 years.<br /><br />Opposition of the constitution is radical activism and it needs to be destroyed in this country.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07899335615984185508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8287994938231817595.post-874175903129313712011-01-31T20:17:38.516-06:002011-01-31T20:17:38.516-06:00Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, a...Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, an influential national advocacy group that pushed for the healthcare overhaul, called Vinson's decision an example of "radical judicial activism run amok".<br /><br />Radical judicial activism ...HUH?<br /><br />Ronny, It's called a judgement based upon the Constitution!AdamsPatriothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07882392107988103781noreply@blogger.com